Global Politics IA Exemplar: Actors and Nicotine Addiction in Poland | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Global Politics HL Internal Assessment Example
How do different actors influence the health and well-being of Polish citizens in terms of combating nicotine addiction on a local and national level?HL
Loading scores...
5
Official IB Result
IB Grade: 5
Criteria A: A: Identification of issue and justification
4/4
0
2
4
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Identification of issue and justification
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
The student identifies a clear political issue and makes their personal reason for choosing it easy to understand.
The student connects nicotine addiction to governance, power, inequality, and public policy rather than treating it as only a health topic.
The student shows a relevant link between their lived experience and the wider political question they investigate.
The student's opening could be even sharper if they named the political tension more explicitly from the start.
The wording of the issue is a little broader than the exact question the student later investigates.
The student could make the specific Global Politics relevance more precise by stating the policy conflict more directly.
Criteria B: B: Explanation of the engagement
3/4
0
2
4
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Explanation of the engagement
Good
Criteria Feedback
The student describes several meaningful engagements that give them access to different perspectives on the issue.
The student's interview with a practitioner is especially valuable because it adds informed insight into addiction prevention and support.
The student explains several ways the engagement changed or deepened their understanding, rather than just listing what they did.
Some of the student's reflection stays focused on personal awareness and health rather than political understanding.
The student could explain more clearly what the engagement revealed about policy, power, or the roles of different actors.
The political implications of what the student learned are present, but they are not developed as fully as they could be.
Criteria C: C: Analysis of issue
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Analysis of issue
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: D: Synthesis and evaluation
2/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Synthesis and evaluation
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.