Report an issue
Geography IA Exemplar: Which of the investigated sites in Luxembourg… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
View file
Back
IB Geography SL Internal Assessment Example
Scores
Rubric
Similar Examples
10
Chat
Which of the investigated sites in Luxembourg City's CBD is the most sustainable?
SL
Loading scores...
A
B
C
D
E
F
6
Official IB Result
IB Grade: 6
Verified
Criteria A: Criterion A: Fieldwork Question and Geographic Context
3/3
0
2
3
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
A.1
Fieldwork question formulation and relevance
Excellent
A.2
Geographic context and location specificity
Excellent
A.3
Mapping and spatial representation
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
The investigation question is clearly geographical, manageable, and directly linked to sustainable tourism theory.
The location is precise and feasible for primary data collection, with five named sites in Luxembourg City’s CBD.
The maps provide strong spatial context and include conventions such as a key, north arrow, and scale bar.
The hypothesis could be made more explicitly testable by linking it to measurable indicators rather than a general prediction.
The geographic context would be slightly stronger with a clearer explanation of why these particular sites were selected over nearby alternatives.
Criteria B: Criterion B: Methods of Investigation
3/3
0
2
3
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
B.1
Method description and relevance
Excellent
B.2
Data collection techniques and implementation
Good
Criteria Feedback
The methods are comprehensively described and clearly aligned to the comparative sustainable-tourism enquiry.
The same techniques are applied systematically across all five sites, improving comparability.
Control of time and duration in the pedestrian and traffic counts strengthens consistency across the investigation.
The reliability of the subjective survey data is limited by consensus scoring and the absence of independent ratings or stronger triangulation.
The land-use method relies on estimates, which reduces precision unless the estimation process is explained in more detail.
Criteria C: Criterion C: Quality and Treatment of Information
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
C.1
Data relevance and sufficiency
Excellent
C.2
Presentation techniques
Good
C.3
Convention adherence
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Criterion D: Written Analysis
5/8
0
4
8
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
D.1
Analytical techniques
Poor
D.2
Data interpretation and linking
Good
D.3
Completeness of analysis
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria E: Criterion E: Conclusion
2/2
0
1
2
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
E.1
Conclusion quality and support
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria F: Criterion F: Evaluation
3/3
0
2
3
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
F.1
Evaluation depth and relevance
Excellent
F.2
Improvement suggestions
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.