Geography IA Exemplar: Urban Microclimate in Panama City | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Geography SL Internal Assessment Example
To what extent is there evidence of an urban microclimate in Panama City, Panama?SL
Loading scores...
6
Official IB Result
IB Grade: 6
Criteria A: Criterion A: Fieldwork Question and Geographic Context
3/3
0
2
3
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Fieldwork question formulation and relevance
Excellent
A.2Geographic context and location specificity
Good
A.3Mapping and spatial representation
Good
Criteria Feedback
The student selected a clearly geographical topic and linked it to urban microclimate ideas such as the heat-island effect and the PLVI model.
The student's map set gives the reader a workable sense of the study area and the seven investigation sites.
The student's hypotheses make the investigation testable and show clear theoretical direction.
The overall geographic context is still broader than it needs to be, because the exact corridor or transect could be stated more precisely.
Some mapping conventions need correction, including the longitude label and the amount of visual clutter on the site maps.
The route map would be stronger if each site’s position and spacing were shown more consistently.
Criteria B: Criterion B: Methods of Investigation
3/3
0
2
3
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Method description and relevance
Good
B.2Data collection techniques and implementation
Good
Criteria Feedback
The student describes several appropriate primary techniques and shows that the investigation involved genuine field collection rather than only secondary research.
The student explains why methods such as traffic counts, building observations, cloud observations, and green-space estimates were relevant to the question.
The student included repeated observations and multiple groups, which is a sensible way to improve reliability.
Some methods are not fully standardised, especially the temperature measurement height and the subjective estimate of green space.
The sampling route is weakened by practical constraints, so the spacing and selection of sites are not consistently systematic.
Important controls such as exact observation position, shade, wind, and timing at each site are not specified clearly enough.
Criteria C: Criterion C: Quality and Treatment of Information
3/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Data relevance and sufficiency
Moderate
C.2Presentation techniques
Moderate
C.3Convention adherence
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Criterion D: Written Analysis
5/8
0
4
8
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Analytical techniques
Poor
D.2Data interpretation and linking
Good
D.3Completeness of analysis
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria E: Criterion E: Conclusion
1/2
0
1
2
Criteria StrandsPro
E.1Conclusion quality and support
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria F: Criterion F: Evaluation
3/3
0
2
3
Criteria StrandsPro
F.1Evaluation depth and relevance
Good
F.2Improvement suggestions
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.