Geography IA Exemplar: “To what extent does the Great Langdale Beck… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Geography HL Internal Assessment Example
“To what extent does the Great Langdale Beck conform to the Bradshaw Model in terms of discharge, pebble size, cross-sectional area and velocity?”HL
Loading scores...
7
Official IB Result
IB Grade: 7
Criteria A: Criterion A: Fieldwork Question and Geographic Context
3/3
0
2
3
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Fieldwork question formulation and relevance
Excellent
A.2Geographic context and location specificity
Excellent
A.3Mapping and spatial representation
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
The student formulates a clear, geographical investigation question that is directly linked to the Bradshaw Model and supports hypothesis formation.
The student's maps are well chosen and show the study area at several scales, making the location of Great Langdale Beck easy to understand.
The student identifies a precise, feasible fieldwork setting with site references, photographs, and what3words details that make the transect easy to locate.
A brief linear description of the exact start and end points of the transect would make the geographic context even clearer.
A small terminology error in the theoretical framing weakens the precision of the geographical explanation.
Some of the maps are visually busy, so improving clarity and readability would strengthen the presentation further.
Criteria B: Criterion B: Methods of Investigation
2/3
0
2
3
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Method description and relevance
Good
B.2Data collection techniques and implementation
Good
Criteria Feedback
The student's methods are organised around the key variables in the investigation and show clear relevance to the research question.
The student describes practical field techniques such as width, depth, velocity, and pebble angularity measurements with enough detail to show how the work was carried out.
The student includes repeated measurements and a structured approach that improves the credibility of the data collection.
The sampling approach is not fully consistent across the report, which makes the method less secure.
Some measurements at inaccessible sites were estimated, which reduces reliability.
The description of the velocity calculation and some methodological notation needs more technical accuracy.
Criteria C: Criterion C: Quality and Treatment of Information
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Data relevance and sufficiency
Good
C.2Presentation techniques
Moderate
C.3Convention adherence
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Criterion D: Written Analysis
8/8
0
4
8
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Analytical techniques
Good
D.2Data interpretation and linking
Good
D.3Completeness of analysis
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria E: Criterion E: Conclusion
2/2
0
1
2
Criteria StrandsPro
E.1Conclusion quality and support
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria F: Criterion F: Evaluation
3/3
0
2
3
Criteria StrandsPro
F.1Evaluation depth and relevance
Excellent
F.2Improvement suggestions
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.