Report an issue
Geography IA Exemplar: Is Sitges more environmentally and culturally… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
View file
Back
IB Geography SL Internal Assessment Example
Scores
Rubric
Similar Examples
10
Chat
Is Sitges more environmentally and culturally sustainable than Calafell?
SL
Loading scores...
A
B
C
D
E
F
6
Official IB Result
IB Grade: 6
Verified
Criteria A: Criterion A: Fieldwork Question and Geographic Context
3/3
0
2
3
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
A.1
Fieldwork question formulation and relevance
Excellent
A.2
Geographic context and location specificity
Excellent
A.3
Mapping and spatial representation
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
The student poses a clear, geographically focused comparative question that is clearly grounded in tourism and sustainability concepts.
The student's use of multiple locational maps creates a strong spatial framework and makes the study areas easy to understand.
The student's chosen sites are specific and feasible for primary fieldwork, which gives the investigation a solid geographic basis.
Some hypothesis wording would be stronger if it identified more precise measurable indicators.
One assumption in the hypothesis language is subjective and should be replaced with a more neutral, evidence-based mechanism.
Criteria B: Criterion B: Methods of Investigation
3/3
0
2
3
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
B.1
Method description and relevance
Good
B.2
Data collection techniques and implementation
Good
Criteria Feedback
The student explains several methods clearly and shows why each one is relevant to the research question.
The student's techniques are used in a way that supports comparison between the two towns.
The student includes enough fieldwork variety to investigate both environmental and cultural sustainability.
Some procedures are still not fully replicable because the collection rules are not always precise enough.
A few methodological choices would be stronger if the student justified the scoring or weighting rules more explicitly.
The reliability of some data is limited by one-off samples and unequal collection conditions.
Criteria C: Criterion C: Quality and Treatment of Information
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
C.1
Data relevance and sufficiency
Good
C.2
Presentation techniques
Excellent
C.3
Convention adherence
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Criterion D: Written Analysis
7/8
0
4
8
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
D.1
Analytical techniques
Good
D.2
Data interpretation and linking
Good
D.3
Completeness of analysis
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria E: Criterion E: Conclusion
2/2
0
1
2
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
E.1
Conclusion quality and support
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria F: Criterion F: Evaluation
0/3
0
2
3
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
F.1
Evaluation depth and relevance
Excellent
F.2
Improvement suggestions
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.