Report an issue
Geography IA Exemplar: Investigation of Patterns of Urban… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
View file
Back
IB Geography HL Internal Assessment Example
Scores
Rubric
Similar Examples
10
Chat
Investigation of Patterns of Urban Environmental Quality in Baku, Azerbaijan.
HL
Loading scores...
A
B
C
D
E
F
7
Official IB Result
IB Grade: 7
Verified
Criteria A: Criterion A: Fieldwork Question and Geographic Context
3/3
0
2
3
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
A.1
Fieldwork question formulation and relevance
Excellent
A.2
Geographic context and location specificity
Excellent
A.3
Mapping and spatial representation
Good
Criteria Feedback
The student's investigation question is clearly geographical and testable, and it is linked well to a relevant theory.
The student identifies a precise study area around Fountain Square in Baku, which makes primary fieldwork feasible.
The student's maps show the location of the study sites and support the spatial focus of the project.
The cartographic presentation is not fully polished because key conventions such as a scale bar are missing.
The site map is visually crowded in places, which makes it harder to read quickly.
The wider geographic context could be tightened so that only the most relevant features are emphasised.
Criteria B: Criterion B: Methods of Investigation
3/3
0
2
3
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
B.1
Method description and relevance
Good
B.2
Data collection techniques and implementation
Good
Criteria Feedback
The student describes a range of methods that are relevant to urban environmental quality, including counts, measurements, and survey data.
The student gives enough procedural detail in places to show how the data were gathered and compared across sites.
The collection of data from 21 sites gives the investigation a solid empirical base.
Some methods are not explained in enough depth, especially how subjective categories were scored and how edge cases were handled.
The reliability of the fieldwork is reduced because there is little evidence of repetition or standardisation across measurements.
The chosen indicators are not always fully justified in relation to the overall theoretical framework.
Criteria C: Criterion C: Quality and Treatment of Information
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
C.1
Data relevance and sufficiency
Moderate
C.2
Presentation techniques
Moderate
C.3
Convention adherence
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Criterion D: Written Analysis
8/8
0
4
8
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
D.1
Analytical techniques
Moderate
D.2
Data interpretation and linking
Moderate
D.3
Completeness of analysis
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria E: Criterion E: Conclusion
2/2
0
1
2
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
E.1
Conclusion quality and support
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria F: Criterion F: Evaluation
3/3
0
2
3
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
F.1
Evaluation depth and relevance
Good
F.2
Improvement suggestions
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.