Geography IA Exemplar: Investigating signs of urban stress in… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Geography SL Internal Assessment Example
Investigating signs of urban stress in relation to proximity to Telok Ayer MarketSL
Loading scores...
7
Official IB Result
IB Grade: 7
Criteria A: Criterion A: Fieldwork Question and Geographic Context
3/3
0
2
3
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Fieldwork question formulation and relevance
Excellent
A.2Geographic context and location specificity
Excellent
A.3Mapping and spatial representation
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
The student formulated a focused, geographically investigable question with a clear spatial focus on variation from a named focal point.
The student's maps are clear and conventionally strong, with useful locational detail, labels, scale bars and north arrows.
The student established a precise and feasible fieldwork location with enough site detail to support primary data collection.
It would be even stronger if the student justified more explicitly why Telok Ayer Market is the best focal point for the investigation.
The zone structure could be explained more clearly so the spatial sampling pattern is easier to follow.
The theoretical framing would benefit from a slightly tighter explanation of how the focal point fits the CBD core.
Criteria B: Criterion B: Methods of Investigation
2/3
0
2
3
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Method description and relevance
Good
B.2Data collection techniques and implementation
Good
Criteria Feedback
The student describes methods that are directly relevant to the research question, including traffic counts, noise readings and an environmental quality survey.
The methods are applied across multiple sites, which gives the student's data a practical and structured basis.
Repeated measurements strengthen the credibility of the dataset compared with a single observation at each site.
The sampling rationale and zone design need clearer justification so the method is easier to reproduce and defend.
The urban-quality survey would be stronger if the scoring criteria were explained more precisely.
The student should say more about controls and consistency for the noise readings and site selection process.
Criteria C: Criterion C: Quality and Treatment of Information
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Data relevance and sufficiency
Excellent
C.2Presentation techniques
Good
C.3Convention adherence
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Criterion D: Written Analysis
6/8
0
4
8
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Analytical techniques
Good
D.2Data interpretation and linking
Good
D.3Completeness of analysis
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria E: Criterion E: Conclusion
2/2
0
1
2
Criteria StrandsPro
E.1Conclusion quality and support
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria F: Criterion F: Evaluation
3/3
0
2
3
Criteria StrandsPro
F.1Evaluation depth and relevance
Good
F.2Improvement suggestions
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.