To what extent do varying levels of education affect a person's Environmental Value Systems (EVS) and their perceptions and behaviors towards sustainability?SL
Loading scores...
5
Official IB Result
IB Grade: 5
Criteria A: Identifying the Context (CXT)
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Research question formulation
Excellent
A.2Environmental issue context
Moderate
A.3Connection between issue and research
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
- Formulates a precise, coherent and focused research question specifying population, variables and relationship.
- Clearly identifies EVS categories and sustainability behaviour in the context of education levels.
- Discussion of the environmental issue lacks depth and specific impacts to ground the study.
- Connections between EVS and sustainability behaviour are described only partially; cultural and socioeconomic mediators are not fully integrated.
Criteria B: Planning (PLA)
3/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Method design
Good
B.2Sampling strategy
Moderate
B.3Risk and ethical considerations
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
- Survey procedure and chi‐squared testing are described sufficiently for replication.
- Method is appropriate to collect relevant data on EVS and sustainability behaviour.
- Details on survey validation, question development and piloting are missing.
- Convenience sampling is stated but lacks justification regarding validity and generalizability.
- Ethical considerations omit informed consent procedures and data protection safeguards.
Criteria C: Results, Analysis and Conclusion (RAC)
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Data presentation
Moderate
C.2Data analysis
Good
C.3Conclusion drawing
Good
Criteria Feedback
- Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
- Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
- Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
- Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Discussion and Evaluation (DEV)
3/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Conclusion evaluation
Moderate
D.2Method evaluation
Moderate
D.3Improvements and extensions
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
- Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
- Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
- Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
- Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria E: Applications (APP)
2/3
0
2
3
Criteria StrandsPro
E.1Application proposal
Excellent
E.2Solution evaluation
Good
Criteria Feedback
- Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
- Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
- Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
- Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria F: Communication (COM)
2/3
0
2
3
Criteria StrandsPro
F.1Structure and organization
Good
F.2Terminology and concision
Good
F.3Logic and coherence
Good
Criteria Feedback
- Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
- Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
- Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
- Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.