How does age group in Petaling Jaya, Selangor influence the level of awareness, in terms of knowledge and practice, on the disposal of batteries to reduce E-waste in order to prevent groundwater pollution?SL
Loading scores...
-
Overall Score
22/30
Criteria A: Identifying the Context (CXT)
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
A.1Research question formulation
Excellent
A.2Environmental issue context
Excellent
A.3Connection between issue and research
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
- Clear, focused research question with specific variables and geographical context
- Sustained, quantitative local and international environmental issue context
- Comprehensive explanation of connections between age-related awareness and groundwater contamination
- The research question wording is somewhat wordy
- Minor suggestions to tighten causal-chain phrasing
Criteria B: Planning (PLA)
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
B.1Method design
Excellent
B.2Sampling strategy
Excellent
B.3Risk and ethical considerations
Good
Criteria Feedback
- Well-detailed, repeatable questionnaire method with clear statistical plan
- Justified quota sampling strategy tied to population strata
- Ethical considerations (anonymity, pilot testing) outlined
- Omission of data-cleaning procedures for missing responses
- Control variable section lacks mention of key confounders (e.g., education, gender)
- Ethical/risk discussion omits data security and emotional discomfort
Criteria C: Results, Analysis and Conclusion (RAC)
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
C.1Data presentation
Excellent
C.2Data analysis
Excellent
C.3Conclusion drawing
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
- Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
- Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
- Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
- Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Discussion and Evaluation (DEV)
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
D.1Conclusion evaluation
Good
D.2Method evaluation
Good
D.3Improvements and extensions
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
- Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
- Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
- Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
- Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria E: Applications (APP)
3/3
0
2
3
Criteria Strands
E.1Application proposal
Excellent
E.2Solution evaluation
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
- Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
- Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
- Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
- Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria F: Communication (COM)
2/3
0
2
3
Criteria Strands
F.1Structure and organization
Excellent
F.2Terminology and concision
Good
F.3Logic and coherence
Good
Criteria Feedback
- Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
- Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
- Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
- Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.