IB Digital Society (DS) HL Internal Assessment Example

You pose a clear evaluative inquiry question that signals analysis rather than simple description.

You anchor the topic in a specific real-world example, which makes the investigation concrete and relevant.

You make several meaningful links between VR and course ideas such as immersion, ethics, health, and systems.

The question is still too broad for the chosen example, so the line of inquiry is not always sustained consistently.

Parts of the presentation move away from the selected game and toward VR in general, which weakens coherence.

Some concept links are stated rather than fully explained in relation to the specific example.

You use three relevant academic sources and generally choose credible research.

You explain why the sources are useful to the inquiry rather than only summarizing them.

You identify the main claims of the sources and connect them to the topic of user experience in VR.

The discussion leans more toward judging reliability than comparing different claims and perspectives.

The sources are not contrasted strongly enough against one another, so tensions and differences in scope are not fully developed.

Missing perspectives such as users, developers, or institutions are not explored in enough depth.