IB Digital Society (DS) HL Internal Assessment Example

Your inquiry question is clear and purposeful, and it is anchored in a real-world example that makes the topic immediately relevant.

You connect the topic well to course ideas such as data, economics, and power, which gives the investigation a meaningful conceptual direction.

You identify plausible evidence you could use, such as sentiment, search interest, and transaction history, which shows a workable starting method.

Your wording is still broader than the evidence you later use, so the focus would be stronger if it were narrowed to one clearly defined case.

The explanation of how online communities and digital trends shape valuation is only partly developed and would benefit from more direct evidence.

The inquiry would be stronger if you stated more clearly which indicators you will actually compare and why they are the best fit.

You discuss three distinct sources and explain what each one contributes to your inquiry.

You often move beyond summary by explaining why a source is useful for understanding memecoin behaviour, influence, or risk.

You show awareness of provenance and scope, especially when you note limitations such as restricted samples or narrower comparison groups.

You evaluate usefulness with some balance by recognising both what each source shows and where it falls short.

At times you state reliability too confidently, especially when publication status or academic format is treated as enough on its own.

Some claims are a little too broad for the evidence available, particularly when a source focuses on one coin or one sample.

A few evaluations would be stronger if you separated credibility from relevance and explained both more carefully.

The limitations of the third source could be considered in more depth, especially in relation to your memecoin-focused inquiry.