Report an issue
Computer Science (CS) IA Exemplar: Task Manager | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
View file
Back
IB Computer Science (CS) HL Internal Assessment Example
Scores
Rubric
Similar Examples
10
Chat
Task Manager
HL
Loading scores...
A
B
C
D
E
3
Official IB Result
IB Grade: 3
Verified
Criteria A: Planning
2/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
A.1
Scenario and Client Investigation
Poor
A.2
Product Rationale
Poor
A.3
Success Criteria
Poor
Criteria Feedback
You identify suitable technologies for the app and give a basic reason for choosing them.
Your product idea is coherent and matches a clear task-management use case.
You do not identify a real client or show evidence that you consulted them.
Your rationale stays general and does not fully connect tool choices to specific client needs.
You do not present clear, measurable success criteria for judging whether the product works well.
Criteria B: Solution Overview
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
B.1
Record of Tasks
Poor
B.2
Design Overview
Excellent
B.3
Test Plan
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
You provide a clear and structured design overview with diagrams, sketches, and database planning.
Your test plan is well organised and includes expected and actual outcomes for each case.
You show the main workflow of the product in a way that is easy to follow.
You do not include a task log or dated record showing how development progressed over time.
Some parts of the design are not fully aligned, such as inconsistencies between the diagram and the database structure.
Criteria C: Development
5/12
0
6
12
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
C.1
Complexity and Ingenuity
Poor
C.2
Use of Tools
Good
C.3
Documentation and Sources
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Functionality and Extensibility
1/4
0
2
4
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
D.1
Product Functionality
Poor
D.2
Extensibility
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria E: Evaluation
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
E.1
Evaluation Against Success Criteria
Poor
E.2
Client/Adviser Feedback
Poor
E.3
Future Recommendations
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.