IB Computer Science (CS) HL Internal Assessment Example

You clearly show what the product is meant to do through the screens, features, and flow diagrams.

Your success checks are linked to real features such as difficulty selection, answer submission, and reset behaviour.

You do not identify a specific client or show evidence of consultation.

The rationale for choosing the product is implied by features but not explicitly justified.

Your success criteria are relevant, but they are not broad or measurable enough to fully capture quality, robustness, and usability.

You present a coherent set of design visuals that show the intended user journey and product structure.

The flowcharts help explain important interactions such as answering questions and viewing statistics.

The test plan includes several relevant checks that reflect the main features of the product.

There is no record of tasks that clearly shows how the work progressed over time.

The design overview is strong in places, but some relationships and method responsibilities could be explained more precisely.

The test plan is useful but not detailed enough to be considered complete or fully systematic.