IB Computer Science (CS) SL Internal Assessment Example

You clearly identified the client and the store context, which makes the project purposeful and grounded in a real need.

Your consultation evidence helped shape the solution direction and showed that the system was based on actual client requirements.

You included a broad set of success criteria that covers many core functions of the product.

Some criteria are still phrased too broadly or ambiguously to be tested with complete precision.

A few requirements do not fully match the final implementation language or scope.

The consultation evidence could be more tightly linked to the final feature set so the planning reads as fully integrated.

You provided a substantial record of tasks that shows the intended development sequence across planning, design, development, testing, and evaluation.

Your design materials give a clear overview of the system structure and show that you thought about flow, interfaces, and internal organization.

The test plan is structured and broad enough to cover many key functions and failure cases.

The record of tasks reads more like a planned schedule than a fully verified development log in places.

Some design artifacts do not match the final implementation cleanly, which reduces their usefulness as a direct guide to development.

The test plan would be stronger with more exact test data and more complete coverage of every requirement.