Report an issue
Computer Science (CS) IA Exemplar: Health Calculator | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
View file
Back
IB Computer Science (CS) SL Internal Assessment Example
Scores
Rubric
Similar Examples
10
Chat
Health Calculator
SL
Loading scores...
A
B
C
D
E
3
Official IB Result
IB Grade: 3
Verified
Criteria A: Planning
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
A.1
Scenario and Client Investigation
Excellent
A.2
Product Rationale
Moderate
A.3
Success Criteria
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Detailed, full transcripts of two client consultations demonstrating thorough engagement
Clear identification of client needs informing functionality and privacy requirements
List of five appropriate success criteria derived from client goals
Broader scenario context and significance are only implied, not fully described
Rationale for product choice is embedded in dialogue and not synthesized into a structured justification
Success criteria are not expressed in measurable terms and omit aspects like accessibility and reliability
Criteria B: Solution Overview
0/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
B.1
Record of Tasks
Poor
B.2
Design Overview
Poor
B.3
Test Plan
Poor
Criteria Feedback
No development log or record of tasks provided
No design overview (e.g., architecture diagram, wireframes) included
No test plan or outline of test cases, expected outcomes, or results
Criteria C: Development
5/12
0
6
12
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
C.1
Complexity and Ingenuity
Poor
C.2
Use of Tools
Poor
C.3
Documentation and Sources
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Functionality and Extensibility
2/4
0
2
4
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
D.1
Product Functionality
Poor
D.2
Extensibility
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria E: Evaluation
2/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
E.1
Evaluation Against Success Criteria
Poor
E.2
Client/Adviser Feedback
Moderate
E.3
Future Recommendations
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.