Report an issue
Computer Science (CS) IA Exemplar: Gstocker Inventory Management… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
View file
Back
IB Computer Science (CS) SL Internal Assessment Example
Scores
Rubric
Similar Examples
10
Chat
Gstocker Inventory Management System
SL
Loading scores...
A
B
C
D
E
5
Official IB Result
IB Grade: 5
Verified
Criteria A: Planning
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
A.1
Scenario and Client Investigation
Excellent
A.2
Product Rationale
Good
A.3
Success Criteria
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
Detailed client investigation with quantified problem context and multiple consultations
Clear scenario description linking client needs to system requirements
Comprehensive set of nine success criteria directly tied to client needs
Rationale lacks comparative analysis of alternative solutions
Technology justification is surface-level with an incomplete server-side explanation
A few success criteria remain qualitative rather than fully measurable
Criteria B: Solution Overview
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
B.1
Record of Tasks
Excellent
B.2
Design Overview
Excellent
B.3
Test Plan
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
Extensive, dated and linked record of over 40 development tasks
Comprehensive design overview including flowcharts, use-case diagram, wireframes and schema
Detailed test plan covering multiple modules with methods and expected results
A handful of task entries are blank or incomplete
Several test-plan expected outcomes are truncated
Design diagrams could annotate exception paths
Criteria C: Development
9/12
0
6
12
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
C.1
Complexity and Ingenuity
Moderate
C.2
Use of Tools
Moderate
C.3
Documentation and Sources
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Functionality and Extensibility
2/4
0
2
4
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
D.1
Product Functionality
Moderate
D.2
Extensibility
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria E: Evaluation
0/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
E.1
Evaluation Against Success Criteria
Poor
E.2
Client/Adviser Feedback
Poor
E.3
Future Recommendations
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.