IB Computer Science (CS) SL Internal Assessment Example

You clearly identified a real client and a genuine problem that justified building the product.

You supported your product choice with comparison to alternatives and linked the features directly to the client’s needs.

Your success criteria are broad, relevant, and mostly measurable, which gives the project a strong target to build towards.

A few parts of the rationale would be even stronger with tighter independent verification of the comparisons you made.

Some success criteria could be separated more cleanly so each one can be tested with greater precision.

A small amount of terminology is inconsistent across the planning materials.

You included a substantial record of the project process with tasks linked to relevant stages of development.

Your design overview shows several forms of planning evidence, including interface layouts and structural diagrams.

You made use of client feedback to refine the design, which shows iterative thinking rather than a one-off draft.

The record reads more like a planned schedule than a complete log of what actually happened during development.

Some diagrams and labels would benefit from clearer naming and more consistent presentation.

A few parts of the overview do not show enough detail to make the development path fully transparent.