Report an issue
Computer Science (CS) IA Exemplar: Dave's Student Portfolio Website | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
View file
Back
IB Computer Science (CS) HL Internal Assessment Example
Scores
Rubric
Similar Examples
10
Chat
Dave's Student Portfolio Website
HL
Loading scores...
A
B
C
D
E
4
Official IB Result
IB Grade: 4
Verified
Criteria A: Planning
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
A.1
Scenario and Client Investigation
Excellent
A.2
Product Rationale
Moderate
A.3
Success Criteria
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Detailed, verbatim transcripts of client meetings provide clear evidence of consultation and scenario definition
Client requirements (device compatibility, professional look, contact form) are explicitly captured
Dates, locations and iterative clarifications demonstrate thoughtful planning
Key planning insights remain in the appendix without narrative synthesis in the main report
Rationale for the product is embedded in dialogue rather than structured justification against alternatives
Success criteria are inferred but not explicitly listed or explained in the body of the report
Criteria B: Solution Overview
1/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
B.1
Record of Tasks
Poor
B.2
Design Overview
Poor
B.3
Test Plan
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Some appendix headings hint at development milestones
No chronological task list or Gantt chart is provided
Design overview is limited to a raw directory tree and lacks structured diagrams or wireframes
There is no outline or table of planned test cases or expected outcomes
Criteria C: Development
5/12
0
6
12
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
C.1
Complexity and Ingenuity
Moderate
C.2
Use of Tools
Good
C.3
Documentation and Sources
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Functionality and Extensibility
3/4
0
2
4
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
D.1
Product Functionality
Excellent
D.2
Extensibility
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria E: Evaluation
3/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
E.1
Evaluation Against Success Criteria
Moderate
E.2
Client/Adviser Feedback
Excellent
E.3
Future Recommendations
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.