Report an issue
Computer Science (CS) IA Exemplar: A home inventory management… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
View file
Back
IB Computer Science (CS) SL Internal Assessment Example
Scores
Rubric
Similar Examples
10
Chat
A home inventory management Application for Android
SL
Loading scores...
A
B
C
D
E
6
Official IB Result
IB Grade: 6
Verified
Criteria A: Planning
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
A.1
Scenario and Client Investigation
Excellent
A.2
Product Rationale
Excellent
A.3
Success Criteria
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
You identified a realistic client need and supported it with detailed consultation evidence.
Your rationale clearly explains why the chosen app is a better fit than simpler alternatives.
Your success criteria are broad, relevant, and mostly measurable, which gives you a solid basis for testing.
A small number of criteria appear slightly inconsistent with the final scope of the project.
One authentication-related requirement was not carried through consistently into the later work.
Criteria B: Solution Overview
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
B.1
Record of Tasks
Good
B.2
Design Overview
Excellent
B.3
Test Plan
Good
Criteria Feedback
You produced a substantial set of design materials that show the structure of the solution clearly.
Your diagrams and wireframes cover the main parts of the app and help explain how the product is meant to work.
Your test outline is linked to the intended features and shows that you were planning for verification from the start.
Some design elements are still too vague to support implementation cleanly.
A few diagrams and data definitions are not fully consistent with the rest of the solution.
The test plan would be stronger with more precise data, boundary cases, and expected outputs.
Criteria C: Development
9/12
0
6
12
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
C.1
Complexity and Ingenuity
Moderate
C.2
Use of Tools
Excellent
C.3
Documentation and Sources
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Functionality and Extensibility
3/4
0
2
4
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
D.1
Product Functionality
Moderate
D.2
Extensibility
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria E: Evaluation
3/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
E.1
Evaluation Against Success Criteria
Good
E.2
Client/Adviser Feedback
Excellent
E.3
Future Recommendations
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.