龍應台的散文集《目送》裡的《跌倒》SL
Loading scores...
6
Official IB Result
IB Grade: 6
Criteria A: Language
12/12
0
6
12
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Vocabulary usage and appropriateness
Good
A.2Grammatical structure variety and complexity
Moderate
A.3Language accuracy and communication effectiveness
Moderate
A.4Pronunciation and intonation
Poor
Criteria Feedback
- The student uses a broad range of literary and analytical vocabulary with a suitably formal register.
- The student combines basic and more complex sentence patterns to build a clear line of argument.
- The student's meaning is consistently clear, and most errors do not block communication.
- The student makes good use of linking and contrast to structure their ideas logically.
- A few word choices are imprecise, which sometimes weakens naturalness and precision.
- Some complex structures are not fully controlled and can sound awkward.
- There are recurring accuracy slips with high-frequency forms that need proofreading.
- Pronunciation and intonation cannot be assessed from the submitted script.
Criteria B: Message—Literary Extract
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Relevance to literary extract
Excellent
B.2Use of extract and development of observations
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
- The student's presentation stays focused on the extract and keeps returning to the child’s emotional isolation.
- The student uses relevant details from the extract to support their interpretation rather than relying on summary alone.
- The student shows a convincing understanding of how imagery, repetition, and inner reflection contribute to meaning.
- The student's conclusion brings the main ideas together in a coherent way.
- Some points would be stronger with closer quotation and more precise unpacking of the author’s language.
- At times the analysis becomes a little assertive or generalized instead of fully grounded in textual detail.
- A few ideas are presented in a list-like way, with less explanation of how they shape the reader’s response.
- The ending becomes slightly broad, and a more specific final insight would make it more compelling.
Criteria C: Message—Conversation
1/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Response relevance and appropriateness
Poor
C.2Response development and depth
Poor
Criteria Feedback
- Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
- Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
- Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
- Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Interactive Skills—Communication
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Comprehension and interaction quality
Poor
D.2Response provision and participation
Poor
Criteria Feedback
- Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
- Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
- Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
- Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.