Chinese B IA Exemplar: 撒哈拉的故事-沙漠中的饭店 | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Chinese B SL Internal Assessment Example
撒哈拉的故事-沙漠中的饭店SL
Loading scores...
6
Official IB Result
IB Grade: 6
Criteria A: Language
7/12
0
6
12
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Vocabulary usage and appropriateness
Moderate
A.2Grammatical structure variety and complexity
Poor
A.3Language accuracy and communication effectiveness
Poor
A.4Pronunciation and intonation
Poor
Criteria Feedback
The student uses a relevant range of vocabulary for a literary oral, including several idiomatic expressions that help express ideas about independence, compromise, and mutual respect.
The student shows some control of basic and more complex sentence structures, such as cause-and-effect and conditional forms.
The student's meaning is usually clear, so the audience can follow their central argument even when some sentences are awkward or incomplete.
Vocabulary is often repetitive, especially in the repeated analytical framing, which limits nuance.
Several word choices and character choices are inaccurate, and these errors sometimes weaken precision.
Complex structures are attempted but not consistently controlled, so they do not yet enhance communication reliably.
There is no audio evidence, so pronunciation and intonation cannot be credited from the submitted material.
Criteria B: Message—Literary Extract
3/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Relevance to literary extract
Moderate
B.2Use of extract and development of observations
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
The student stays mostly relevant to the chosen extract and keeps returning to the relationship between 三毛 and 荷西.
The student identifies several key details from the text, including independence, language difference, and mutual respect.
The student's observations are usually connected to the extract rather than drifting completely away from it.
Some interpretations become speculative and go beyond what the extract securely supports.
Development is uneven, with some claims stated too quickly rather than explained through close textual analysis.
The response sometimes becomes descriptive or generalized instead of analysing the writer’s wording in detail.
Criteria C: Message—Conversation
2/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Response relevance and appropriateness
Moderate
C.2Response development and depth
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Interactive Skills—Communication
1/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Comprehension and interaction quality
Poor
D.2Response provision and participation
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.