Overall Score: 17/24
Was this exemplar helpful?
Criteria A: Research Design
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Excellent
Research question context
Excellent
Methodological considerations
Good
Methodology description
Criteria Feedback
- Research question situated in a specific, well-justified chemical context (thiosulfate–iron clock reaction and Arrhenius theory).
- Methodological considerations are fully explained with clear justifications for catalyst choice, temperature range and replicates.
- Variables table, risk assessment and design details demonstrate comprehensive planning for relevant and sufficient data collection.
- Procedure description has minor ambiguities (volume of “one drop”, timing protocol between water bath and reaction flask).
- Controlled-variables table omits mention of calibration for measuring cylinders and pipette tolerance in uncertainty analysis.
- Risk assessment should include use of fume hood when handling corrosive ferric chloride.
Criteria B: Data Analysis
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Excellent
Communication of data recording and processing
Good
Consideration of uncertainties
Good
Data processing quality
Criteria Feedback
- Data tables and Arrhenius plots are clearly labeled with units, uncertainties and statistical descriptors, demonstrating precise communication.
- Uncertainties are propagated through to activation energy calculations, showing solid consideration of measurement error.
- Data processing steps (averages, rates, ln k, regression) are logical and largely accurate.
- Propagation of uncertainties omits some sources (thermometer calibration, regression-gradient error) and is sometimes oversimplified.
- Minor numerical inconsistencies (e.g., intermediate Ea value for CuSO₄, unit typo for FeCl₃) reduce accuracy.
- Formatting issues in formula presentation and table headings (units for reciprocal temperature, significant-figure consistency).
Criteria C: Conclusion
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Good
Conclusion relevance and support
Moderate
Scientific context comparison
Criteria Feedback
- Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
- Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
- Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
- Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Evaluation
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Good
Methodological weaknesses
Good
Suggested improvements
Criteria Feedback
- Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
- Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
- Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
- Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.