Chemistry IA Exemplar: How the concentration of Na2S2O3 affects the… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Chemistry HL Internal Assessment Example
How the concentration of Na2S2O3 affects the rate of reaction with HCl and therefore determine the order of reaction with respect to sodium thiosulfate.HL
Loading scores...
7
Official IB Result
IB Grade: 7
Criteria A: Research Design
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Research question context
Excellent
A.2Methodological considerations
Moderate
A.3Methodology description
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
The student states a focused, measurable research question with a clear independent variable and a sensible kinetic aim.
The student's background explains why the disappearing-cross method is suitable for a sulfur-forming reaction.
The student includes practical planning choices such as repeated trials, a preliminary test, and a fixed total volume.
The claim that hydrochloric acid is in excess is not demonstrated by the quantities used.
Some methodological details needed for exact replication are missing or inconsistent.
Temperature is monitored rather than controlled, which weakens experimental control.
Criteria B: Data Analysis
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Communication of data recording and processing
Excellent
B.2Consideration of uncertainties
Moderate
B.3Data processing quality
Poor
Criteria Feedback
The student presents the raw and processed data in a clear, organised way with appropriate tables and units.
The student's use of repeated trials and mean values improves the reliability of the dataset.
The graph, regression line, and error bars show good awareness of how to communicate processed results visually.
The rate is treated too confidently as an absolute rate rather than a relative rate based on time to endpoint.
The uncertainty treatment is incomplete because it underestimates the real spread in the repeated measurements.
The processing does not fully account for the impact of the acid-dilution and excess-reactant issue on the validity of the trend.
Criteria C: Conclusion
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Conclusion relevance and support
Moderate
C.2Scientific context comparison
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Evaluation
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Methodological weaknesses
Moderate
D.2Suggested improvements
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.