How does varying wavelengths (nm) emitted by Lumica bracelet glowsticks (380-450 nm (violet), 450-495 nm (blue), 520-530 nm (green), 570-590 nm (yellow), 620-750 nm (red)) affect the activation energy (kJ mol-1) of the chemiluminescent reaction between 0.05 mol dm-3 hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and 0.08 mol dm-3 phenyl oxalate ester (C14H10O4), determined by plotting the light intensity (lux) of a glowstick 10 minutes after activation as it cools down (348K to 303K), using a light sensor and temperature probe?
Loading scores...
Overall Score: 21/24
Was this exemplar helpful?
Want a report just like this?
Free mini report for your own coursework
Fast feedback on what to improve next
Annotated highlights on your writing
Criteria A: Research Design
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Excellent
Research question context
Excellent
Methodological considerations
Excellent
Methodology description
Criteria Feedback
Research question situated in a highly specific chemical context linking Arrhenius behaviour, photon energy and glow-stick mechanism
Methodological considerations are systematically explained, with independent/dependent variables justified, six controlled variables tabulated and rationales given
Procedure is detailed with clear volumes, times, temperatures, photographs and diagrams supporting reproducibility
Minor ambiguities remain (exact size of aluminium enclosure and construction of the ‘steepest line of worst fit’ could be more precise)
Dependent variable description could more explicitly link lux measurements to reaction rate for clarity
Criteria B: Data Analysis
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Excellent
Communication of data recording and processing
Good
Consideration of uncertainties
Good
Data processing quality
Criteria Feedback
Data tables and graphs are clearly labelled with units and uncertainties, and error bars are included to illustrate uncertainty impact
Uncertainty propagation formulas are applied correctly in principle, demonstrating strong conceptual understanding
Overall communication of data recording and processing is clear and precise
Propagation mixes relative and absolute uncertainties in places, and some error bars are invisible due to scaling
Headings misalign in uncertainty tables and a misprint (Δ(1/π) instead of Δ(1/T)) reduces precision
Numerical inconsistencies (mismatched Ea table entries) and absent worst-fit line sketch introduce significant but non-critical inaccuracies
Criteria C: Conclusion
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Excellent
Conclusion relevance and support
Good
Scientific context comparison
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Unlock all criteria
Upgrade to PRO to see detailed feedback for all criteria in this exemplar.
Criteria D: Evaluation
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Excellent
Methodological weaknesses
Excellent
Suggested improvements
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Unlock all criteria
Upgrade to PRO to see detailed feedback for all criteria in this exemplar.
Chemistry IA Exemplar: Wavelength and Chemiluminescent Activation Energy | RevisionDojo