Chemistry IA Exemplar: How does increasing the molality of sodium… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Chemistry HL Internal Assessment Example
How does increasing the molality of sodium chloride (NaCl)
solutions from 0.5 m to 6.0 m, in 0.5 m intervals, affect their boiling point, compared
with theoretical values derived from the Van’t Hoff factor?HL
Loading scores...
-
Overall Score
21/24
Criteria A: Research Design
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
A.1Research question context
Excellent
A.2Methodological considerations
Excellent
A.3Methodology description
Good
Criteria Feedback
You framed a focused, chemically specific question with clear variables and an appropriate theoretical comparison.
You justified key design choices well, especially the use of molality and the chosen concentration range.
You included enough procedural detail and controls for the investigation to be broadly reproducible.
Some procedural details still need tightening, especially stirring conditions and exactly how apparatus was assigned across trials.
The method does not fully resolve the issue of incomplete dissolution at the highest concentrations.
A few steps, such as calibration and endpoint wording, could be stated more precisely for complete reproducibility.
Criteria B: Data Analysis
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
B.1Communication of data recording and processing
Excellent
B.2Consideration of uncertainties
Moderate
B.3Data processing quality
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
You present raw and processed data in an organized way that is easy to follow.
You calculate means, use regression, and compare your experimental trend with a theoretical expectation.
You make some meaningful use of uncertainty information and include labelled graphical presentation.
The treatment of uncertainty is incomplete, especially where replicate spread is much larger than the quoted error bars.
Some processing choices do not fully match the behaviour of the data, particularly at the highest concentrations.
There are a few precision and consistency issues in the way results are reported.
Criteria C: Conclusion
3/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
C.1Conclusion relevance and support
Moderate
C.2Scientific context comparison
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Evaluation
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
D.1Methodological weaknesses
Excellent
D.2Suggested improvements
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.