Chemistry IA Exemplar: How does changing the structural isomerism in… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Chemistry HL Internal Assessment Example
How does changing the structural isomerism in hexane (hexane, 2-methylpentane, 3-methylpentane,
2,3-dimethylbutane and 2,2-dimethylbutane) influence its enthalpy of combustion measured using
calorimetry?HL
Loading scores...
-
Overall Score
19/24
Criteria A: Research Design
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
A.1Research question context
Excellent
A.2Methodological considerations
Moderate
A.3Methodology description
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Your research question is focused, measurable, and clearly situated in a relevant chemistry context.
You include several sensible methodological controls and give a procedure that is largely reproducible.
You justify the choice of calorimetry in a way that fits the investigation well.
The chemical rationale could be more precise, especially in how branching relates to enthalpy of combustion.
Key validity factors such as calorimeter calibration, heat exchange correction, and probe precision are not fully addressed.
Some procedural details still leave small but important ambiguities for complete replication.
Criteria B: Data Analysis
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
B.1Communication of data recording and processing
Moderate
B.2Consideration of uncertainties
Poor
B.3Data processing quality
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Your raw data and processed tables are generally well organised and easy to follow.
You process the results into useful derived quantities and include a relevant statistical test.
You show some awareness that uncertainty and repeat measurements matter.
The calculation method is not fully transparent because the working is not shown with enough detail.
There are traceability and precision issues in the tables, including inconsistent labels and presentation.
Uncertainty is not treated rigorously, and the effect of measurement variation is not incorporated into the interpretation.
Criteria C: Conclusion
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
C.1Conclusion relevance and support
Moderate
C.2Scientific context comparison
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Evaluation
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
D.1Methodological weaknesses
Moderate
D.2Suggested improvements
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.