Biology IA Exemplar: To what extent does the incubation temperature… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Biology SL Internal Assessment Example
To what extent does the incubation temperature (20°C, 30°C, 40°C, 50°C, and 60°C) affect the soluble protein concentration of lentil (Lens culinaris) extracts as determined by the Biuret test and measured using colourimetry?SL
Loading scores...
7
Official IB Result
IB Grade: 7
Criteria A: Research Design
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Research question context
Excellent
A.2Methodological considerations
Good
A.3Methodology description
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
The student's research question is focused and clearly situated in a specific biological context.
The student justifies the temperature range and includes several thoughtful controls and replicates.
The student's procedure contains enough operational detail that another reader could broadly follow the investigation.
The student shows clear awareness of how methodological choices affect fairness and reliability.
Some important aspects of the method are not fully explained, especially how temperature was verified in practice.
The investigation does not fully resolve whether heating changes extraction efficiency or the solubility of already prepared extract.
There are a few inconsistencies and omissions, such as the blank choice and the mismatch in water volumes.
The context is weakened by a couple of scientific inaccuracies and an overreliance on evidence from a less directly comparable protein source.
Criteria B: Data Analysis
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Communication of data recording and processing
Moderate
B.2Consideration of uncertainties
Moderate
B.3Data processing quality
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
The student's raw data are organised clearly, with repeated trials shown for each temperature.
The student calculates means, standard deviations, and displays a graph with labelled axes, error bars, and a trendline.
The student makes an appropriate comment about the weakness of the linear relationship instead of overstating the pattern.
The student's qualitative observations add useful experimental context to the numerical results.
There is an internal inconsistency in the processed values, especially for the 20°C mean, which needs to be corrected and kept consistent throughout.
A single averaged uncertainty for all error bars reduces precision and hides variation between temperatures.
The concentration conversion is not valid as written because the chosen basis does not match the assay and sample type.
The outlier removal is not sufficiently justified statistically.
Criteria C: Conclusion
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Conclusion relevance and consistency
Good
C.2Scientific context comparison
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Evaluation
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Methodological weaknesses
Good
D.2Improvements
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.