Biology IA Exemplar: Tea Tree Oil Concentration and E. coli Inhibition | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Biology SL Internal Assessment Example
How does modifying the concentrations (0%, 20%, 40%, 60%, 80%, 100%) of Melaleuca alternifolia leaf oil (Tea Tree oil) affect the growth of Escherichia coli (E. coli) by measuring the zone of inhibition of E.coli?SL
Loading scores...
7
Official IB Result
IB Grade: 7
Criteria A: Research Design
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Research question context
Excellent
A.2Methodological considerations
Moderate
A.3Methodology description
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
The student's research question is specific, focused, and clearly testable.
The student places the investigation in a scientifically relevant context by linking tea tree oil chemistry to bacterial structure.
The student's method contains enough operational detail to make the investigation largely reproducible.
The question should name the prepared tea tree oil–Polysorbate 80 stock solution more precisely.
Some important controls and methodological justifications are missing or only partly explained.
A few procedural details remain ambiguous, especially around plate layout, measurement conventions, and inoculum standardization.
Criteria B: Data Analysis
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Communication of data recording and processing
Moderate
B.2Consideration of uncertainties
Poor
B.3Data processing quality
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
The student's data are organised clearly in tables and a graph, making the main trend easy to follow.
The student processes repeated measurements into means, which is an appropriate way to summarise the results.
The student includes error bars and shows awareness that variation exists between trials.
The student's use of units is inconsistent in places, which reduces precision.
The statistical treatment is not fully correct or transparently shown.
Uncertainty is acknowledged only in a limited way and is not fully incorporated into the processing.
Criteria C: Conclusion
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Conclusion relevance and consistency
Moderate
C.2Scientific context comparison
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Evaluation
3/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Methodological weaknesses
Moderate
D.2Improvements
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.