Biology IA Exemplar: An experiment on the effect of a banana’s… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Biology HL Internal Assessment Example
An experiment on the effect of a banana’s ripeness on the temperature at which it experiences structural alterHL
Loading scores...
7
Official IB Result
IB Grade: 7
Criteria A: Research Design
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Research question context
Moderate
A.2Methodological considerations
Good
A.3Methodology description
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
The student states a focused research question and places it in a clear biological context.
The student identifies several relevant controls and practical considerations, including replication, temperature measurement, and safety.
The student's method is detailed enough that another student could broadly follow the investigation.
The key term the student is investigating is not defined precisely enough to be measured consistently.
Some of the scientific background is oversimplified or not tightly linked to what the student's method can actually show.
A few important variables, especially sample mass, heating rate, and the endpoint definition, are not controlled clearly enough for reliable replication.
Criteria B: Data Analysis
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Communication of data recording and processing
Moderate
B.2Consideration of uncertainties
Moderate
B.3Data processing quality
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
The student presents raw results, summaries, and a statistical test, so the main pattern in the data can be followed.
The student calculates means and standard deviations, which shows that they are trying to quantify variation as well as central tendency.
The student's tables give a usable overview of the relationship between ripeness and the recorded temperature change.
Some of the reporting is not consistently clear or precise, especially in the way units and uncertainty are written.
The uncertainty treatment is not always mathematically or physically matched to the temperature data.
The processing is relevant, but it does not fully analyse the whole relationship across all ripeness levels, and some of the supporting compositional evidence is limited.
Criteria C: Conclusion
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Conclusion relevance and consistency
Good
C.2Scientific context comparison
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Evaluation
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Methodological weaknesses
Excellent
D.2Improvements
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.