IB Business Management SL Extended Essay Example

The research question is specific and well integrated, guiding both environmental and economic strands of the essay.

The title clearly communicates an interdisciplinary focus on environmental and economic sustainability of PLA bioplastics, effectively framing the investigation.

Methodology section outlines secondary sources well but lacks any primary data collection; consider including a survey or interviews.

The economic sustainability introduction is conceptually sound but would benefit from more precise definitions supported by theory citations.

The CSR analysis describes pyramid tiers well but stops short of linking back to your specific research question; connect CSR findings to RQ.

The final evaluation reflection shows engagement with interdisciplinary methods but would benefit from more detailed analysis of methodological limitations.

The introductory paragraph references Ritchie et al. without a year; add complete in-text citations to strengthen academic rigor.

Definitions of sustainability are well integrated, but the citation lacks a page or date reference; include full details in-text.

The 83% figure for food-related waste is presented without an inline reference; add citation to underpin this key statistic.

The phrase “it's strong chains” contains a contraction and is informal; revise to “its strong polymer chains” for precision.

The description of hydrolysis vs glycolysis lacks quantitative recycling efficiency data; include figures to support analysis.

PET vs PLA processing descriptions describe energy qualitatively; include comparative CO₂ emission figures for deeper analysis.

The use of a Wikipedia article in the bibliography requires justification; consider citing more authoritative sources or explaining its inclusion.

The final sentence of the introduction is truncated; complete the thought to ensure clarity of the environmental problem statement.

The LCA resources section introduces the concept well; consider adding a summary table of impact categories and values.

The atom economy calculation for PLA appears mathematically incorrect; revisit molar masses and recalculate accurately.

The overall summary segment is descriptive but could better link conclusions explicitly back to the research question.

Recycling rate calculation mixes UK PET data with a global PLA statement; ensure data scope consistency for valid comparison.

SWOT analysis strengths section integrates price volatility and policy incentives effectively to support economic sustainability arguments.

The SWOT conclusion effectively synthesizes strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats to support your final economic judgement.

The ethical responsibility section is descriptive but lacks critical evaluation; consider discussing ethical dilemmas or trade-offs.

Several entries (e.g., SWOT main header) lack page numbers, reducing usability of the contents page.

The table of contents structure is clear and logically ordered, aiding reader comprehension.

Figure 1 appears pixelated and its caption formatting is inconsistent; consider replacing with higher-resolution image and standardizing style.

The URL in the figure caption breaks across lines; adjust line breaks or use a DOI for cleaner formatting.

Figures 3 and 4 lack explicit captions or labels; add descriptive captions to clarify their roles in the circular economy discussion.

The “Opportunities” subsection ends mid-sentence, indicating an editing oversight; complete the thought and proofread thoroughly.

Bibliography entries on pages 23–25 are not alphabetically arranged; sort entries to enhance navigability and professionalism.