World Studies Extended Essay Exemplar: Theme: Science, technology… | RevisionDojo

Loading document preview...

IB World Studies HL Extended Essay Example

Theme: Science, technology and society • Subjects: Computer Science (CS) and Digital Society (DS) • How does AI-driven automation in U.S. e-commerce improve operational efficiency while influencing the digital divide between small and large retailers?HL

Official IB Result

IB Grade: B

Criteria A: Focus and Method

4/6

Criteria StrandsPro

A.1Topic identification and communication

Excellent

A.2Research question formulation

Moderate

A.3Methodology selection and justification

Poor

Criteria Feedback

Your topic is clearly communicated and has a strong interdisciplinary focus on AI-enabled e-commerce and inequality among retailers.
Your research question gives the investigation a specific comparison and a clear line of inquiry.
You show some awareness of appropriate methods and ethical considerations, including the idea of interviewing and anonymizing responses.
You attempt to justify your approach with relevant frameworks and source selection.

Your question is still too broad to investigate with precision because key terms such as efficiency, digital divide, and retailer size are not fully defined.
Your methodology is not detailed enough to show how evidence was actually collected, sampled, or analysed.
The report presents mock interviews in a way that weakens the credibility of the method.
Your source-selection rationale stays general and does not clearly explain why each source is authoritative or how it will be used.

Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding

4/6

Criteria StrandsPro

B.1Source material selection and relevance

Moderate

B.2Knowledge demonstration and application

Poor

B.3Use of terminology and concepts

Moderate

Criteria Feedback

You demonstrate a solid grasp of core AI applications in e-commerce such as recommendation systems, chatbots, forecasting, and logistics optimization.
You use relevant concepts like AI-driven automation, machine learning, personalization, and the digital divide appropriately.
You make a useful connection between theory and the argument, especially when linking resources and competitive advantage to larger firms.
Your examples show that you understand that AI can affect several business functions rather than only one isolated process.

Your evidence is often presented in a broad or descriptive way rather than being integrated into a sustained and well-supported argument.
Several important statistics and claims are not fully traceable to clearly identified sources in the essay.
Some source choices are not as strong as they could be because they rely too heavily on commercial explainers or unclear references.
The theoretical concepts are introduced well, but they are not developed deeply enough to shape the whole discussion.

Criteria C: Critical Thinking

9/12

Criteria StrandsPro

C.1Research quality and relevance

Poor

C.2Analysis and conclusions

Poor

C.3Argument structure and evaluation

Poor

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Criteria D: Presentation

4/4

Criteria StrandsPro

D.1Academic structure

Good

D.2Visual elements

Poor

D.3Referencing and formatting

Poor

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Loading scores...

Official IB Result

IB Grade: B

Criteria A: Focus and Method

4/6

Criteria StrandsPro

A.1Topic identification and communication

Excellent

A.2Research question formulation

Moderate

A.3Methodology selection and justification

Poor

Criteria Feedback

Your topic is clearly communicated and has a strong interdisciplinary focus on AI-enabled e-commerce and inequality among retailers.
Your research question gives the investigation a specific comparison and a clear line of inquiry.
You show some awareness of appropriate methods and ethical considerations, including the idea of interviewing and anonymizing responses.
You attempt to justify your approach with relevant frameworks and source selection.

Your question is still too broad to investigate with precision because key terms such as efficiency, digital divide, and retailer size are not fully defined.
Your methodology is not detailed enough to show how evidence was actually collected, sampled, or analysed.
The report presents mock interviews in a way that weakens the credibility of the method.
Your source-selection rationale stays general and does not clearly explain why each source is authoritative or how it will be used.

Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding

4/6

Criteria StrandsPro

B.1Source material selection and relevance

Moderate

B.2Knowledge demonstration and application

Poor

B.3Use of terminology and concepts

Moderate

Criteria Feedback

You demonstrate a solid grasp of core AI applications in e-commerce such as recommendation systems, chatbots, forecasting, and logistics optimization.
You use relevant concepts like AI-driven automation, machine learning, personalization, and the digital divide appropriately.
You make a useful connection between theory and the argument, especially when linking resources and competitive advantage to larger firms.
Your examples show that you understand that AI can affect several business functions rather than only one isolated process.

Your evidence is often presented in a broad or descriptive way rather than being integrated into a sustained and well-supported argument.
Several important statistics and claims are not fully traceable to clearly identified sources in the essay.
Some source choices are not as strong as they could be because they rely too heavily on commercial explainers or unclear references.
The theoretical concepts are introduced well, but they are not developed deeply enough to shape the whole discussion.

Criteria C: Critical Thinking

9/12

Criteria StrandsPro

C.1Research quality and relevance

Poor

C.2Analysis and conclusions

Poor

C.3Argument structure and evaluation

Poor

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Criteria D: Presentation

4/4

Criteria StrandsPro

D.1Academic structure

Good

D.2Visual elements

Poor

D.3Referencing and formatting

Poor

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.