World Studies Extended Essay Exemplar: Theme: Health and development… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB World Studies SL Extended Essay Example
Theme: Health and development • Subjects: Biology and Economics • To what extent is income inequality correlated with Tuberculosis incidence rates across India
between 2012 to 2022?SL
Loading scores...
A
Overall Score
23/28
Criteria A: Focus and Method
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
A.1Topic identification and communication
Excellent
A.2Research question formulation
Good
A.3Methodology selection and justification
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
You communicate a clear and well-defined topic with a relevant interdisciplinary focus.
You state a focused research question with a clear time frame and location.
You show a thoughtful attempt to justify your choice of methods and variables.
The investigation’s method does not fully match the question because the analysis uses national annual data rather than state-level comparisons.
The design is weakened by a very small sample, estimated values, and a regression setup that is not strong enough for the intended claim.
Your explanation of the method would be stronger if you justified more explicitly why this model is the best way to test the relationship.
Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
B.1Source material selection and relevance
Good
B.2Knowledge demonstration and application
Good
B.3Use of terminology and concepts
Good
Criteria Feedback
You use a broad range of relevant sources, including institutional data and academic literature.
You demonstrate solid understanding of both the health context and the economic concepts involved.
You use disciplinary terminology with good range and mostly accurate application.
Some source choices are less authoritative, and the source trail for annual values is not always transparent.
At times the discussion is more explanatory than fully integrated, especially when distinguishing inequality from poverty.
A few terms and units are not used consistently, which reduces precision.
Criteria C: Critical Thinking
9/12
0
6
12
Criteria Strands
C.1Research quality and relevance
Moderate
C.2Analysis and conclusions
Moderate
C.3Argument structure and evaluation
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Presentation
4/4
0
2
4
Criteria Strands
D.1Academic structure
Excellent
D.2Visual elements
Good
D.3Referencing and formatting
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.