World Studies Extended Essay Exemplar: Theme: Environmental and/or… | RevisionDojo

Loading document preview...

IB World Studies SL Extended Essay Example

Theme: Environmental and/or economic sustainability • Subjects: Environmental systems and societies (ESS) and Economics • How do government incentives/policies and environmental values shape consumer motivations in adopting electric vehicles in JaBoDeTaBek (Jakarta, Bogor, Depok, Tangerang, Bekasi), Indonesia?SL

Official IB Result

IB Grade: A

Criteria A: Focus and Method

4/6

Criteria StrandsPro

A.1Topic identification and communication

Excellent

A.2Research question formulation

Good

A.3Methodology selection and justification

Moderate

Criteria Feedback

You define a clear, localized research topic and keep the investigation anchored in JaBoDeTaBek.
You show an appropriate interdisciplinary intention by linking environmental and economic ideas to the same question.
Your method uses primary data from EV owners, which gives the study direct relevance to the issue you are investigating.

Some parts of the topic broaden beyond the exact consumer-motivation focus and make the inquiry less sharply targeted.
The research question would be stronger if its key terms were separated more precisely so each factor can be examined on its own.
Your methodology would be more convincing with clearer sampling and verification details.

Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding

5/6

Criteria StrandsPro

B.1Source material selection and relevance

Moderate

B.2Knowledge demonstration and application

Good

B.3Use of terminology and concepts

Good

Criteria Feedback

You demonstrate sound understanding of ESS and economics ideas and use them in ways that are relevant to the investigation.
Your source base includes material that is mostly appropriate to Indonesia and to electric vehicles.
You use subject terminology with good consistency and usually in a way that supports the argument.

Some concepts are applied too strongly or too broadly, especially when environmental or economic claims are made from limited evidence.
A few terms and classifications are simplified in ways that reduce precision.
The investigation would be stronger if more of the evidence were tied directly to the Indonesian context rather than to general global examples.

Criteria C: Critical Thinking

12/12

Criteria StrandsPro

C.1Research quality and relevance

Moderate

C.2Analysis and conclusions

Moderate

C.3Argument structure and evaluation

Moderate

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Criteria D: Presentation

4/4

Criteria StrandsPro

D.1Academic structure

Excellent

D.2Visual elements

Good

D.3Referencing and formatting

Moderate

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Loading scores...

Official IB Result

IB Grade: A

Criteria A: Focus and Method

4/6

Criteria StrandsPro

A.1Topic identification and communication

Excellent

A.2Research question formulation

Good

A.3Methodology selection and justification

Moderate

Criteria Feedback

You define a clear, localized research topic and keep the investigation anchored in JaBoDeTaBek.
You show an appropriate interdisciplinary intention by linking environmental and economic ideas to the same question.
Your method uses primary data from EV owners, which gives the study direct relevance to the issue you are investigating.

Some parts of the topic broaden beyond the exact consumer-motivation focus and make the inquiry less sharply targeted.
The research question would be stronger if its key terms were separated more precisely so each factor can be examined on its own.
Your methodology would be more convincing with clearer sampling and verification details.

Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding

5/6

Criteria StrandsPro

B.1Source material selection and relevance

Moderate

B.2Knowledge demonstration and application

Good

B.3Use of terminology and concepts

Good

Criteria Feedback

You demonstrate sound understanding of ESS and economics ideas and use them in ways that are relevant to the investigation.
Your source base includes material that is mostly appropriate to Indonesia and to electric vehicles.
You use subject terminology with good consistency and usually in a way that supports the argument.

Some concepts are applied too strongly or too broadly, especially when environmental or economic claims are made from limited evidence.
A few terms and classifications are simplified in ways that reduce precision.
The investigation would be stronger if more of the evidence were tied directly to the Indonesian context rather than to general global examples.

Criteria C: Critical Thinking

12/12

Criteria StrandsPro

C.1Research quality and relevance

Moderate

C.2Analysis and conclusions

Moderate

C.3Argument structure and evaluation

Moderate

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Criteria D: Presentation

4/4

Criteria StrandsPro

D.1Academic structure

Excellent

D.2Visual elements

Good

D.3Referencing and formatting

Moderate

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.