World Studies Extended Essay Exemplar: Theme: Environmental and/or… | RevisionDojo

Loading document preview...

IB World Studies SL Extended Essay Example

Theme: Environmental and/or economic sustainability • Subjects: Economics and Geography • To what extent have EU agricultural subsidies under the Common Agricultural Policy (2023-2027) enhanced France’s food security while promoting environmental sustainability in the context of the grain crop industry?SL

Overall Score

23/28

Criteria A: Focus and Method

4/6

Criteria Strands

A.1Topic identification and communication

Good

A.2Research question formulation

Moderate

A.3Methodology selection and justification

Moderate

Criteria Feedback

You identify a clear and workable topic with a specific policy, place, sector, and time frame.
You show awareness of both Economics and Geography as complementary lenses.
You explain your intended approach rather than simply naming methods.

The inquiry would be stronger if you defined exactly which aspect of food security you are measuring.
Some sections drift into broad background material that is not tightly tied to the research question.
Your method is described more than it is operationalized, so the reader cannot always see how evidence will be selected and compared.

Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding

5/6

Criteria Strands

B.1Source material selection and relevance

Moderate

B.2Knowledge demonstration and application

Moderate

B.3Use of terminology and concepts

Moderate

Criteria Feedback

You use a range of relevant material drawn from policy, agricultural, and geographical contexts.
You demonstrate clear understanding of major ideas such as subsidies, supply, prices, externalities, drought, and spatial variation.
You attempt to connect the evidence from different disciplines into one argument about food security.

Some policy and economic concepts are simplified too far, especially the way CAP is described as a direct production subsidy.
Several claims are supported more by general theory or description than by evidence directly showing impact.
Your use of terminology is generally accurate, but the depth and precision are uneven in places.

Criteria C: Critical Thinking

10/12

Criteria Strands

C.1Research quality and relevance

Poor

C.2Analysis and conclusions

Poor

C.3Argument structure and evaluation

Poor

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Criteria D: Presentation

4/4

Criteria Strands

D.1Academic structure

Good

D.2Visual elements

Moderate

D.3Referencing and formatting

Moderate

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Loading scores...

Overall Score

23/28

Criteria A: Focus and Method

4/6

Criteria Strands

A.1Topic identification and communication

Good

A.2Research question formulation

Moderate

A.3Methodology selection and justification

Moderate

Criteria Feedback

You identify a clear and workable topic with a specific policy, place, sector, and time frame.
You show awareness of both Economics and Geography as complementary lenses.
You explain your intended approach rather than simply naming methods.

The inquiry would be stronger if you defined exactly which aspect of food security you are measuring.
Some sections drift into broad background material that is not tightly tied to the research question.
Your method is described more than it is operationalized, so the reader cannot always see how evidence will be selected and compared.

Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding

5/6

Criteria Strands

B.1Source material selection and relevance

Moderate

B.2Knowledge demonstration and application

Moderate

B.3Use of terminology and concepts

Moderate

Criteria Feedback

You use a range of relevant material drawn from policy, agricultural, and geographical contexts.
You demonstrate clear understanding of major ideas such as subsidies, supply, prices, externalities, drought, and spatial variation.
You attempt to connect the evidence from different disciplines into one argument about food security.

Some policy and economic concepts are simplified too far, especially the way CAP is described as a direct production subsidy.
Several claims are supported more by general theory or description than by evidence directly showing impact.
Your use of terminology is generally accurate, but the depth and precision are uneven in places.

Criteria C: Critical Thinking

10/12

Criteria Strands

C.1Research quality and relevance

Poor

C.2Analysis and conclusions

Poor

C.3Argument structure and evaluation

Poor

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Criteria D: Presentation

4/4

Criteria Strands

D.1Academic structure

Good

D.2Visual elements

Moderate

D.3Referencing and formatting

Moderate

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.