World Studies Extended Essay Exemplar: Theme: Environmental and/or… | RevisionDojo

Loading document preview...

IB World Studies SL Extended Essay Example

Theme: Environmental and/or economic sustainability • Subjects: Business Management and Economics • To what extent have Shein's marketing contributed to its e-commerce growth in the United States while exacerbating market failure in China since 2021, contributing to the global issue of fast-fashion's trade-off between product affordability and sustainability?SL

Official IB Result

IB Grade: A

Criteria A: Focus and Method

5/6

Criteria StrandsPro

A.1Topic identification and communication

Excellent

A.2Research question formulation

Good

A.3Methodology selection and justification

Good

Criteria Feedback

You communicate a clear and relevant World Studies topic from the outset.
Your research question is clearly stated and anchored in a real case study with place and time context.
You justify your choice of business and economics methods rather than simply listing them.

The research question is still broader than it needs to be for a tightly controlled argument.
Some methods, especially the elasticity work, are not fully secure for the claim you want them to support.
Your terminology shifts slightly in places, which weakens the consistency of the investigation.

Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding

5/6

Criteria StrandsPro

B.1Source material selection and relevance

Good

B.2Knowledge demonstration and application

Good

B.3Use of terminology and concepts

Good

Criteria Feedback

You show solid understanding of key business and economics ideas and apply them to the case effectively.
Your source selection is broad and mostly relevant to the investigation.
You use a wide range of subject terminology with good accuracy overall.

Some applications are a little overextended, especially where the evidence does not fully support the claim.
A few concepts, such as adverse selection and elasticity, need more precision.
The source base is useful but not consistently strong enough to be described as expertly chosen.

Criteria C: Critical Thinking

10/12

Criteria StrandsPro

C.1Research quality and relevance

Moderate

C.2Analysis and conclusions

Moderate

C.3Argument structure and evaluation

Moderate

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Criteria D: Presentation

3/4

Criteria StrandsPro

D.1Academic structure

Excellent

D.2Visual elements

Good

D.3Referencing and formatting

Good

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Criteria E: Engagement

Criteria StrandsPro

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Loading scores...

Official IB Result

IB Grade: A

Criteria A: Focus and Method

5/6

Criteria StrandsPro

A.1Topic identification and communication

Excellent

A.2Research question formulation

Good

A.3Methodology selection and justification

Good

Criteria Feedback

You communicate a clear and relevant World Studies topic from the outset.
Your research question is clearly stated and anchored in a real case study with place and time context.
You justify your choice of business and economics methods rather than simply listing them.

The research question is still broader than it needs to be for a tightly controlled argument.
Some methods, especially the elasticity work, are not fully secure for the claim you want them to support.
Your terminology shifts slightly in places, which weakens the consistency of the investigation.

Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding

5/6

Criteria StrandsPro

B.1Source material selection and relevance

Good

B.2Knowledge demonstration and application

Good

B.3Use of terminology and concepts

Good

Criteria Feedback

You show solid understanding of key business and economics ideas and apply them to the case effectively.
Your source selection is broad and mostly relevant to the investigation.
You use a wide range of subject terminology with good accuracy overall.

Some applications are a little overextended, especially where the evidence does not fully support the claim.
A few concepts, such as adverse selection and elasticity, need more precision.
The source base is useful but not consistently strong enough to be described as expertly chosen.

Criteria C: Critical Thinking

10/12

Criteria StrandsPro

C.1Research quality and relevance

Moderate

C.2Analysis and conclusions

Moderate

C.3Argument structure and evaluation

Moderate

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Criteria D: Presentation

3/4

Criteria StrandsPro

D.1Academic structure

Excellent

D.2Visual elements

Good

D.3Referencing and formatting

Good

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Criteria E: Engagement

Criteria StrandsPro

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.