World Studies Extended Essay Exemplar: Theme: Conflict, peace and… | RevisionDojo

Loading document preview...

IB World Studies SL Extended Essay Example

Theme: Conflict, peace and security • Subjects: Global Politics and Computer Science (CS) • To what extent did Twitter's split network algorithmic model influence the amplification of election misinformation in Kenya's 2022 general elections?SL

Official IB Result

IB Grade: A

Criteria A: Focus and Method

5/6

Criteria StrandsPro

A.1Topic identification and communication

Excellent

A.2Research question formulation

Good

A.3Methodology selection and justification

Moderate

Criteria Feedback

You communicate a clear and appropriate topic from the start, with a strong interdisciplinary link between algorithmic systems and electoral trust.
Your research question is specific, time-bound, and focused on an evaluative judgement rather than a broad discussion.
You show awareness of why secondary research is a suitable approach for a topic with limited access to proprietary platform data.

Your method is described more clearly than it is carried out, so the actual steps for source selection and analysis could be explained more precisely.
The mixed-method approach is named but not fully operationalised, especially in terms of how qualitative and quantitative evidence are combined.
Some of the causal language in the investigation goes beyond what the method can securely establish.

Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding

5/6

Criteria StrandsPro

B.1Source material selection and relevance

Moderate

B.2Knowledge demonstration and application

Moderate

B.3Use of terminology and concepts

Moderate

Criteria Feedback

You demonstrate a solid understanding of how engagement-based recommendation can shape content visibility.
You use a range of relevant sources and contexts, including Kenyan election material and broader algorithmic research.
You apply disciplinary terminology with generally good accuracy and show genuine effort to connect technical and political ideas.

Some technical claims are presented too confidently for the evidence you provide.
The source base is relevant overall, but not consistently expert in quality or traceable in every case.
Important concepts such as misinformation and disinformation are not always distinguished with enough precision.

Criteria C: Critical Thinking

10/12

Criteria StrandsPro

C.1Research quality and relevance

Moderate

C.2Analysis and conclusions

Poor

C.3Argument structure and evaluation

Moderate

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Criteria D: Presentation

3/4

Criteria StrandsPro

D.1Academic structure

Good

D.2Visual elements

Good

D.3Referencing and formatting

Moderate

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Loading scores...

Official IB Result

IB Grade: A

Criteria A: Focus and Method

5/6

Criteria StrandsPro

A.1Topic identification and communication

Excellent

A.2Research question formulation

Good

A.3Methodology selection and justification

Moderate

Criteria Feedback

You communicate a clear and appropriate topic from the start, with a strong interdisciplinary link between algorithmic systems and electoral trust.
Your research question is specific, time-bound, and focused on an evaluative judgement rather than a broad discussion.
You show awareness of why secondary research is a suitable approach for a topic with limited access to proprietary platform data.

Your method is described more clearly than it is carried out, so the actual steps for source selection and analysis could be explained more precisely.
The mixed-method approach is named but not fully operationalised, especially in terms of how qualitative and quantitative evidence are combined.
Some of the causal language in the investigation goes beyond what the method can securely establish.

Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding

5/6

Criteria StrandsPro

B.1Source material selection and relevance

Moderate

B.2Knowledge demonstration and application

Moderate

B.3Use of terminology and concepts

Moderate

Criteria Feedback

You demonstrate a solid understanding of how engagement-based recommendation can shape content visibility.
You use a range of relevant sources and contexts, including Kenyan election material and broader algorithmic research.
You apply disciplinary terminology with generally good accuracy and show genuine effort to connect technical and political ideas.

Some technical claims are presented too confidently for the evidence you provide.
The source base is relevant overall, but not consistently expert in quality or traceable in every case.
Important concepts such as misinformation and disinformation are not always distinguished with enough precision.

Criteria C: Critical Thinking

10/12

Criteria StrandsPro

C.1Research quality and relevance

Moderate

C.2Analysis and conclusions

Poor

C.3Argument structure and evaluation

Moderate

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Criteria D: Presentation

3/4

Criteria StrandsPro

D.1Academic structure

Good

D.2Visual elements

Good

D.3Referencing and formatting

Moderate

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.