This site uses cookie tracking technologies. Learn more in our Cookie Policy.
World Studies Extended Essay Exemplar: Resistance Training for… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB World Studies SL Extended Essay Example
Sports science and psychology - How can resistance training and resistance training be an
alternative therapeutic measure to improving depression of male citizens aged 18-25 in
the united sates of America?SL
Loading scores...
A
Overall Score
23/28
Was this exemplar helpful?
Want a report just like this?
Free mini report for your own coursework
Fast feedback on what to improve next
Annotated highlights on your writing
Criteria A: Focus and Method
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
A.1Topic identification and communication
Good
A.2Research question formulation
Moderate
A.3Methodology selection and justification
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
The topic is communicated clearly and appropriately, with explicit identification of global theme, demographic focus, and disciplinary lenses.
The student provides a coherent explanation of the choice of secondary-source methodology, referencing epidemiological data and RCT findings in support.
The research question is understandable and framed to allow evaluative comparison between resistance training and pharmacological treatment.
The research question remains somewhat vague and repetitive, lacking precise delimitation of parameters such as frequency and outcome measures.
Inclusion/exclusion criteria for source selection are not defined, and data-analysis procedures are only sketched.
Some over-breadth in scope (all resistance modalities, wide depression severity range) dilutes methodological focus.
Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
B.1Source material selection and relevance
Good
B.2Knowledge demonstration and application
Moderate
B.3Use of terminology and concepts
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Source material is predominantly peer-reviewed and directly relevant (JAMA Psychiatry, Psychiatry Research, WHO reports).
Key concepts (SSRIs, RPE, neuroplasticity) are explained with generally accurate, discipline-specific terminology.
Background statistics on prevalence and pharmacological usage demonstrate sound use of data to justify the study’s significance.
Integration of sources is often descriptive rather than analytical, with limited original synthesis across disciplines.
Terminology is mostly accurate but occasionally redundant or imprecise (e.g., repeated phrasing).
In-text citations and bibliography formatting show inconsistencies, detracting from scholarly rigour.
Criteria C: Critical Thinking
10/12
0
6
12
Criteria Strands
C.1Research quality and relevance
Poor
C.2Analysis and conclusions
Poor
C.3Argument structure and evaluation
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Unlock all criteria
Upgrade to PRO to see detailed feedback for all criteria in this exemplar.
Criteria D: Presentation
4/4
0
2
4
Criteria Strands
D.1Academic structure
Good
D.2Visual elements
Good
D.3Referencing and formatting
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Unlock all criteria
Upgrade to PRO to see detailed feedback for all criteria in this exemplar.
