This site uses cookie tracking technologies. Learn more in our Cookie Policy.
World Studies Extended Essay Exemplar: Gender Norms and Women’s… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB World Studies SL Extended Essay Example
Psychology & Economics: How do gender norms towards domestic responsibilities in Malaysia affect women's psychological health and their participation in the labour force?SL
Loading scores...
A
Overall Score
26/28
Was this exemplar helpful?
Want a report just like this?
Free mini report for your own coursework
Fast feedback on what to improve next
Annotated highlights on your writing
Criteria A: Focus and Method
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
A.1Topic identification and communication
Good
A.2Research question formulation
Good
A.3Methodology selection and justification
Good
Criteria Feedback
The student clearly communicates an interdisciplinary topic with appropriate geographic scope and defines key terms effectively.
The research question is explicit, revisited in the conclusion, and shows coherent linkage to the investigation.
Methodological choices are appropriate and supported by justification, including pilot testing and mixed‐methods design.
The investigation covers two substantial outcome areas, which slightly dilutes the sharpness of focus.
Background context occasionally strays into regional comparisons (Korea and China) rather than centering Malaysia directly.
Methodological limitations (convenience sampling and potential biases) are noted but could be more rigorously addressed.
Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
B.1Source material selection and relevance
Good
B.2Knowledge demonstration and application
Good
B.3Use of terminology and concepts
Good
Criteria Feedback
Disciplinary terminology (HDI, GII, labour‐supply curves, biopsychosocial stressors) is used accurately and consistently.
A broad range of relevant primary and secondary sources is employed, including UNDP and World Bank data alongside the original survey.
The student integrates psychological theories and economic models to explain empirical findings, demonstrating interdisciplinary application.
Some key claims lack explicit citation to peer‐reviewed sources, and a number of references rely on blogs or NGO reports.
Minor conceptual lapses occur (for example, conflating acronyms in economic diagrams).
The bibliography remains skewed toward non‐academic sources and would benefit from additional scholarly journal articles.
Criteria C: Critical Thinking
12/12
0
6
12
Criteria Strands
C.1Research quality and relevance
Moderate
C.2Analysis and conclusions
Moderate
C.3Argument structure and evaluation
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Unlock all criteria
Upgrade to PRO to see detailed feedback for all criteria in this exemplar.
Criteria D: Presentation
4/4
0
2
4
Criteria Strands
D.1Academic structure
Excellent
D.2Visual elements
Good
D.3Referencing and formatting
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Unlock all criteria
Upgrade to PRO to see detailed feedback for all criteria in this exemplar.
