This site uses cookie tracking technologies. Learn more in our Cookie Policy.
World Studies Extended Essay Exemplar: Battery Economics and EV… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB World Studies SL Extended Essay Example
Physics and Economics. How do the economic incentives and physical limitations of battery technology influence the adoption and scalability of electric vehicles in developing economies like India?SL
A
Overall Score
23/28
Was this exemplar helpful?
Want a report just like this?
Free mini report for your own coursework
Fast feedback on what to improve next
Annotated highlights on your writing
Criteria A: Focus and Method
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
A.1Topic identification and communication
Excellent
A.2Research question formulation
Excellent
A.3Methodology selection and justification
Good
Criteria Feedback
The topic is communicated clearly and maintained throughout the report, with an explicit interdisciplinary focus on economics and physics.
The research question is sharply formulated, fully focused and underpins the essay’s structure.
The methodology chapter presents appropriate methods (documentary and comparative analysis) clearly aligned to the RQ, demonstrating informed selection.
Justification for source selection and reliability assessment is only briefly addressed and could be deepened.
Key contextual framing (Global Context) appears late and could be moved earlier to reinforce focus alignment.
While methods are appropriate, more explicit detail on triangulation strategies and source-criticism would strengthen the methodology justification.
Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
B.1Source material selection and relevance
Excellent
B.2Knowledge demonstration and application
Excellent
B.3Use of terminology and concepts
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
Source material is expertly chosen, with over thirty recent peer-reviewed and industry reports directly relevant to the RQ.
Knowledge of both economic and physical concepts is coherent and integrated, with accurate and consistent use of specialised terminology.
Terminology and units (e.g., Wh·kg⁻¹, ionic conductivity) are employed precisely, reflecting deep conceptual understanding.
A few descriptive passages (e.g., on recycling and policy overviews) marginally dilute analytical depth.
One bibliographic entry is incomplete/misformatted and should be corrected for full academic rigour.
Criteria C: Critical Thinking
9/12
0
6
12
Criteria Strands
C.1Research quality and relevance
Good
C.2Analysis and conclusions
Good
C.3Argument structure and evaluation
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Unlock all criteria
Upgrade to PRO to see detailed feedback for all criteria in this exemplar.
Criteria D: Presentation
2/4
0
2
4
Criteria Strands
D.1Academic structure
Excellent
D.2Visual elements
Poor
D.3Referencing and formatting
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Unlock all criteria
Upgrade to PRO to see detailed feedback for all criteria in this exemplar.
