This site uses cookie tracking technologies. Learn more in our Cookie Policy.
World Studies Extended Essay Exemplar: Wastewater-Based Epidemiology… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB World Studies HL Extended Essay Example
How Consistent Is Wastewater Based Epidemiology (WBE) in Testing for the Prevalence Of Narcotics in New York City with Other, Traditional Narcotic Habits Data such as Crime Data and Overdose Rates?HL
B
Overall Score
21/28
Was this exemplar helpful?
Want a report just like this?
Free mini report for your own coursework
Fast feedback on what to improve next
Annotated highlights on your writing
Criteria A: Focus and Method
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
A.1Topic identification and communication
Excellent
A.2Research question formulation
Excellent
A.3Methodology selection and justification
Good
Criteria Feedback
You communicate a clear interdisciplinary topic and keep the investigation focused on a specific place and set of substances.
Your research question is clearly stated and stays aligned with the investigation throughout.
You select methods and sources that are broadly appropriate and show a solid understanding of how wastewater-based epidemiology works.
The wording of the research question could be more precise by defining what you mean by consistency.
The rationale for some source and timeframe choices is not fully developed.
The method would be stronger if you explained more clearly how the different datasets are being made comparable.
Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
B.1Source material selection and relevance
Good
B.2Knowledge demonstration and application
Good
B.3Use of terminology and concepts
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
You demonstrate strong understanding of the chemistry and public-health vocabulary connected to the topic.
Your explanation of the laboratory process shows that you understand why the measurements are reliable and how the data were produced.
Your sources are mostly relevant and are applied with clear purpose in the investigation.
Some parts of the evidence would benefit from deeper explanation of why the selected data are the most suitable for the comparison.
The different datasets are not always integrated as fully as they could be.
A few claims would be stronger if you explained the source material more explicitly instead of relying mainly on description.
Criteria C: Critical Thinking
8/12
0
6
12
Criteria Strands
C.1Research quality and relevance
Good
C.2Analysis and conclusions
Good
C.3Argument structure and evaluation
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Unlock all criteria
Upgrade to PRO to see detailed feedback for all criteria in this exemplar.
Criteria D: Presentation
3/4
0
2
4
Criteria Strands
D.1Academic structure
Excellent
D.2Visual elements
Excellent
D.3Referencing and formatting
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Unlock all criteria
Upgrade to PRO to see detailed feedback for all criteria in this exemplar.
