Spanish B Extended Essay Exemplar: La Casa de los Espíritus y… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Spanish B SL Extended Essay Example
De qué manera “La Casa de Los Espíritus” utiliza el realismo mágico como un medio para descifrar los acontecimientos socio políticos en Chile durante el siglo XX?SL
Loading scores...
B
Official IB Result
IB Grade: B
Criteria A: Focus and Method
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Topic communication and appropriateness
Excellent
A.2Research question clarity and focus
Excellent
A.3Methodology completeness
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
The title and introduction clearly communicate the research focus on magical realism and its socio-political context.
The research question is precisely stated as a ‘¿De qué manera…?’ inquiry and is tightly linked to the essay’s analysis.
Topic is communicated accurately and effectively, demonstrating a clear and appropriate purpose and focus.
No dedicated methodology section explaining how sources were selected and evaluated, limiting transparency.
Over-reliance on popular web sources rather than academic or peer-reviewed materials reduces methodological rigor.
The table of contents omits any methodology discussion, which would clarify research steps and criteria.
Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Application of source material
Moderate
B.2Subject knowledge
Moderate
B.3Use of terminology and concepts
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Relevant quotations from the novel are well integrated and support the investigation’s argument.
The student shows clear subject knowledge of magical-realist conventions and key Chilean historical events.
Core terminology (e.g., realismo mágico, dictadura) is used accurately and consistently overall.
Dependence on general biography websites weakens the academic depth of the context provided.
Some historical details are simplified and lack deeper analytical framing within the argument.
Occasional language slips and spelling errors reduce the precision of terminology.
Criteria C: Critical Thinking
5/12
0
6
12
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Research quality
Poor
C.2Analysis depth
Poor
C.3Discussion and evaluation
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Presentation
4/4
0
2
4
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Structure appropriateness
Good
D.2Layout considerations
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.