Psychology Extended Essay Exemplar: To what extent does the lack of… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Psychology SL Extended Essay Example
To what extent does the lack of the development of the prefrontal cortex impact procrastination in university students?SL
Loading scores...
B
Official IB Result
IB Grade: B
Criteria A: Focus and Method
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Topic communication and explanation
Good
A.2Research question formulation and focus
Moderate
A.3Research methodology
Poor
Criteria Feedback
The student introduces the investigation clearly and keeps the topic anchored to procrastination, executive functioning, and the prefrontal cortex.
The student's research question is explicit and stays linked to the main line of discussion throughout the report.
The student uses a range of relevant studies and shows purposeful selection when building the argument.
The student shows a clear awareness that different concepts such as structure, function, and connectivity need to be distinguished.
The research question is still a little too broad and implies a stronger causal claim than the evidence can support.
The methodology is not clearly explained, especially how sources were chosen, compared, and evaluated.
Some important concepts are blended together, which reduces precision in the investigation.
A few contextual sources are less academically robust than the core studies, which weakens methodological control.
Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Subject knowledge and source application
Moderate
B.2Use of terminology and concepts
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
The student shows good foundational understanding of procrastination, executive functions, and the role of the prefrontal cortex.
The student uses subject-specific terminology frequently and often in a way that helps explain the research.
The student demonstrates awareness of important methodological and conceptual issues such as self-report bias, confounding variables, and limits of cross-sectional evidence.
The student usually connects studies back to the topic rather than leaving them as isolated summaries.
Some terminology is used imprecisely, especially when structural and functional ideas are treated as interchangeable.
A few claims go beyond what the studies can directly show, particularly when correlational findings are interpreted too strongly.
Some study descriptions blur the difference between behavioural measures and direct neural evidence.
At times the writing uses technical language accurately but not always consistently or with full conceptual control.
Criteria C: Critical Thinking
8/12
0
6
12
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Research quality and relevance
Moderate
C.2Analysis depth and effectiveness
Poor
C.3Discussion and evaluation
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Presentation
1/4
0
2
4
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Structure appropriateness
Excellent
D.2Layout and formatting
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.