Report an issue
Psychology Extended Essay Exemplar: Marijuana Use and School… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
View file
Back
IB Psychology SL Extended Essay Example
Scores
Rubric
Similar Examples
10
Chat
“To what extent does marijuana usage affect adolescents' school performance?”
SL
Loading scores...
A
B
C
D
A
Official IB Result
IB Grade: A
Verified
Criteria A: Focus and Method
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
A.1
Topic communication and explanation
Good
A.2
Research question formulation and focus
Moderate
A.3
Research methodology
Poor
Criteria Feedback
You communicate the broad educational focus clearly and show why the topic matters.
Your research question is stated and remains visible throughout the essay.
You use a relevant range of source types and show some awareness of methodological issues such as correlation, confounding, and ecological validity.
The scope is still too broad and key terms like school performance are not clearly operationalised.
The methodology is not explained clearly enough, especially how sources were selected and weighed.
Some background material is not tightly linked to the investigation, which weakens focus.
Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
B.1
Subject knowledge and source application
Moderate
B.2
Use of terminology and concepts
Good
Criteria Feedback
You show good understanding of THC, cannabinoid receptors, brain regions, and adolescent neurodevelopment.
You use subject-specific terminology in a generally accurate way.
You demonstrate awareness of research concepts such as longitudinal design, self-report bias, confounding variables, and correlation versus causation.
At times you present causal claims more strongly than the evidence supports.
Some concepts are applied too broadly, especially when you move from cognitive or mental-health evidence to school performance.
A few evaluations of studies are technically imprecise, such as treating sample size or bias in overly absolute terms.
Criteria C: Critical Thinking
12/12
0
6
12
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
C.1
Research quality and relevance
Moderate
C.2
Analysis depth and effectiveness
Poor
C.3
Discussion and evaluation
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Presentation
3/4
0
2
4
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
D.1
Structure appropriateness
Excellent
D.2
Layout and formatting
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.