Psychology Extended Essay Exemplar: “To What Extent Does Childhood… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Psychology SL Extended Essay Example
“To What Extent Does Childhood Abuse Influence the Development of Psychopathy?”SL
Loading scores...
A
Official IB Result
IB Grade: A
Criteria A: Focus and Method
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Topic communication and explanation
Good
A.2Research question formulation and focus
Moderate
A.3Research methodology
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
You communicate the topic clearly and the reader can quickly see that the investigation is about the relationship between childhood abuse and psychopathy.
Your research question is stated explicitly and stays visible throughout the essay.
You include a usable secondary-research approach with multiple empirical studies from different contexts.
The opening frame is broader than the evidence can fully support, especially where childhood abuse, trauma, ACEs, and neglect are treated as interchangeable.
The research question is still too wide and is worded in a way that suggests causation beyond what correlational studies can show.
The method would be stronger if you explained how and why the studies were selected, rather than only summarising them.
Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Subject knowledge and source application
Moderate
B.2Use of terminology and concepts
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
You show good working understanding of psychopathy-related concepts such as primary and secondary psychopathy, callous-unemotional traits, and heritability.
You use psychological terminology with enough accuracy to make the discussion understandable.
You generally apply the studies to the topic rather than merely naming them.
Some terminology is used too loosely, especially where different measures and constructs are blended together.
A few claims about self-report data, adolescents, and cultural differences are too general or not fully supported by the study evidence.
The explanation of validity and bias would be stronger if you distinguished the specific source of error more carefully in each case.
Criteria C: Critical Thinking
12/12
0
6
12
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Research quality and relevance
Moderate
C.2Analysis depth and effectiveness
Moderate
C.3Discussion and evaluation
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Presentation
4/4
0
2
4
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Structure appropriateness
Excellent
D.2Layout and formatting
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.