Psychology Extended Essay Exemplar: To what extent does an… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Psychology SL Extended Essay Example
To what extent does an adolescent’s attachment style, resulting from an absent father, impact academic performance?SL
Loading scores...
B
Official IB Result
IB Grade: B
Criteria A: Focus and Method
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Topic communication and explanation
Good
A.2Research question formulation and focus
Moderate
A.3Research methodology
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
The student's investigation has a clear psychological focus and a well-stated research question.
The student uses a recognizable research method and brings in a relevant range of sources and approaches.
The student shows awareness of how sources were selected by using studies that connect attachment, father absence, and academic outcomes.
The scope shifts between physical absence, emotional absence, and attachment style without always separating them clearly.
The methodology would be stronger if the student explained why specific sources were chosen and how they were prioritized.
Some of the evidence is only indirectly related to adolescents, which weakens the tightness of the focus.
Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Subject knowledge and source application
Moderate
B.2Use of terminology and concepts
Good
Criteria Feedback
The student demonstrates solid knowledge of attachment theory and related developmental ideas.
The student uses subject-specific terminology in a generally accurate way, including concepts such as secure attachment, operationalization, correlational design, and confounding variables.
The student often connects theory to research findings in a way that shows they understand how psychological ideas apply to the topic.
Some attachment concepts are not always used with full precision, especially when distinguishing different attachment labels or forms of absence.
At times the student moves too quickly from correlation to causal language.
A few studies are applied rather broadly, especially when findings from younger children are used to support claims about adolescents.
Criteria C: Critical Thinking
7/12
0
6
12
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Research quality and relevance
Poor
C.2Analysis depth and effectiveness
Poor
C.3Discussion and evaluation
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Presentation
2/4
0
2
4
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Structure appropriateness
Good
D.2Layout and formatting
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.