Physics Extended Essay Example: Viscosity and Flow in a Vortex | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Physics SL Extended Essay Example
How does the viscosity of the fluid affect the mass and volumetric flow of an incompressible fluid in a vortex?SL
Loading scores...
A
Official IB Result
IB Grade: A
Criteria A: Focus and Method
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Topic clarity and communication
Good
A.2Research question formulation and focus
Moderate
A.3Methodology appropriateness and completeness
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
The student clearly states a relevant investigation topic and maintains an understandable line of enquiry throughout the report.
The student's method includes repeated trials, controls, raw data, uncertainty estimates, and enough procedural detail to make the experiment broadly reproducible.
The student shows some informed selection of variables and experimental design choices rather than relying on a purely descriptive approach.
The investigation shifts between the vortex and the outlet pipe, which makes the focus less precise than it could be.
Some key variables are not measured or fully verified, especially temperature and vortex consistency.
There are inconsistencies in the apparatus and mixture descriptions that reduce methodological clarity and reproducibility.
Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Subject knowledge application
Moderate
B.2Use of terminology and concepts
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
The student uses much of the relevant physics vocabulary accurately, including viscosity, density, vorticity, flow rate, and uncertainty-related terms.
The student applies subject knowledge to the investigation rather than listing definitions in isolation.
The student's use of equations, units, and calculations shows a generally secure understanding of the topic.
Some core explanations are inaccurate, such as the treatment of divergence and the way continuity is linked to Navier-Stokes.
Several conceptual claims are oversimplified or overstated, especially where the student infers relationships directly from equations without sufficient support.
The theory would be stronger if the student connected the physics more carefully to the actual experimental geometry and measured variables.
Criteria C: Critical Thinking
12/12
0
6
12
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Research analysis and evaluation
Poor
C.2Discussion and argument development
Poor
C.3Critical evaluation
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Presentation
4/4
0
2
4
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Structure and formatting
Good
D.2Layout and visual elements
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.