Physics Extended Essay Example: How does the number of blades (2, 3,… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Physics SL Extended Essay Example
How does the number of blades (2, 3, 4, 5, 6) of a propeller affect the optimal power input at which thrust-to-power ratio is maximized for a stationary aircraft?SL
Loading scores...
B
Official IB Result
IB Grade: B
Criteria A: Focus and Method
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Topic clarity and communication
Excellent
A.2Research question formulation and focus
Good
A.3Methodology appropriateness and completeness
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
The student establishes a clear real-world purpose and keeps the topic consistently tied to propeller performance.
The student's investigation includes a substantial methodology with repeated trials, controlled variables, uncertainty treatment, and a complementary computational model.
The student narrows the scope to static testing and defines the performance measure early, which helps the reader follow the direction of the work.
The central measure the student chose becomes mathematically problematic at very low power, which weakens how well the question can be answered.
The investigation does not fully separate blade number from other geometric changes such as solidity, blade area, and balance.
Some parts of the method are only partially convincing because the simulation assumptions and experimental limitations are not fully aligned.
Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Subject knowledge application
Moderate
B.2Use of terminology and concepts
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
The student uses a wide range of relevant physics ideas and vocabulary, including thrust, torque, induced flow, Reynolds number, and uncertainty.
The student's explanation of the aerodynamic reasoning shows that they understand how the variables in the investigation connect to the underlying physics.
The student makes good use of sources and their own data to support the theoretical framework.
Several symbols, units, and notations are inconsistent or incorrect, which weakens confidence in the mathematical communication.
Some derivations and substitutions are not fully secure, so the theoretical presentation is not always reliable.
The distinction between idealized theory and the real motor-propeller system is not always handled clearly enough.
Criteria C: Critical Thinking
10/12
0
6
12
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Research analysis and evaluation
Poor
C.2Discussion and argument development
Poor
C.3Critical evaluation
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Presentation
4/4
0
2
4
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Structure and formatting
Good
D.2Layout and visual elements
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.