Report an issue
Physics Extended Essay Example: Guitar String Corrosion and… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
View file
Back
IB Physics SL Extended Essay Example
Scores
Rubric
Similar Examples
10
Chat
How does the corrosion rate of guitar strings affect their resonance frequencies?
SL
Loading scores...
A
B
C
D
A
Official IB Result
IB Grade: A
Verified
Criteria A: Focus and Method
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
A.1
Topic clarity and communication
Excellent
A.2
Research question formulation and focus
Excellent
A.3
Methodology appropriateness and completeness
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
The student communicates a clear Physics topic that is easy to understand from the start.
The student's research question is specific enough to guide the investigation and stay connected to the data.
The student provides a substantial method with apparatus, controls, repeated readings, and supporting visuals.
The method does not fully justify how the corrosion variable is being measured.
Some important variables affecting the string’s behaviour are not controlled or verified well enough.
The investigation would be stronger if the scope were narrowed more tightly to the exact string system used.
Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
B.1
Subject knowledge application
Moderate
B.2
Use of terminology and concepts
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
The student uses a good range of relevant Physics terminology, including standing waves, resonance frequency, tension, and linear mass density.
The student shows clear understanding of the basic relationship between string properties and frequency.
The student's explanations are generally understandable and usually connected to the investigation.
Some technical terms and procedures are used inaccurately or too loosely.
The electrochemical interpretation is not always secure, especially where corrosion and Tafel analysis are discussed.
A few claims would be stronger if the student defined the exact string type and reaction context more precisely.
Criteria C: Critical Thinking
12/12
0
6
12
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
C.1
Research analysis and evaluation
Poor
C.2
Discussion and argument development
Poor
C.3
Critical evaluation
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Presentation
3/4
0
2
4
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
D.1
Structure and formatting
Good
D.2
Layout and visual elements
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.