Physics Extended Essay Example: How does an increase in the angle of… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Physics SL Extended Essay Example
How does an increase in the angle of attack of a NACA 0012 Airfoil affect the lift coefficient in a low-speed wind tunnel?SL
Loading scores...
B
Official IB Result
IB Grade: B
Criteria A: Focus and Method
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Topic clarity and communication
Excellent
A.2Research question formulation and focus
Excellent
A.3Methodology appropriateness and completeness
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
The student states a clear and specific investigation into how angle of attack affects the lift coefficient of a NACA 0012 airfoil.
The student's topic is communicated with purpose, and the link between the experiment and the research question is easy to follow.
The method shows some thoughtful planning, including repeated trials, variable identification, and uncertainty awareness.
The measured force is not handled with enough precision in the method, so the conversion to lift is not clearly justified.
Some methodological controls are missing or only implied, especially around airflow consistency, blockage, calibration, and zero/tare correction.
The tested angle range and flow conditions would be clearer if stated more explicitly and consistently.
Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Subject knowledge application
Moderate
B.2Use of terminology and concepts
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
The student uses a strong range of aerodynamics terms appropriately, including lift coefficient, Reynolds number, angle of attack, stall, and flow separation.
The student shows genuine subject knowledge by connecting the airfoil geometry and the experiment to expected aerodynamic behaviour.
The student's writing generally demonstrates understanding of the core physics ideas behind the investigation.
Some explanations are oversimplified, especially where lift is treated too narrowly and flow behaviour is discussed too generally.
There are important accuracy issues in the force and flow discussion, including the handling of laminar/turbulent flow and the lift conversion.
A few terms and notations are used inconsistently, which weakens the precision of the student's scientific language.
Criteria C: Critical Thinking
7/12
0
6
12
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Research analysis and evaluation
Poor
C.2Discussion and argument development
Poor
C.3Critical evaluation
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Presentation
3/4
0
2
4
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Structure and formatting
Good
D.2Layout and visual elements
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.