Physics Extended Essay Example: How accurately can you measure and… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Physics HL Extended Essay Example
How accurately can you measure and predict where a falling tower of lego will snapHL
Loading scores...
B
Official IB Result
IB Grade: B
Criteria A: Focus and Method
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Topic clarity and communication
Good
A.2Research question formulation and focus
Moderate
A.3Methodology appropriateness and completeness
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
The student chose a recognisable physics problem and communicated a clear investigative direction from the start.
The student's method includes several thoughtful practical choices, such as repeated trials, measured dimensions, and attempts to reduce observational error.
The student connected the experiment to relevant mechanical ideas rather than relying on a purely descriptive approach.
The student's central question is not fully operationalised, so the reader cannot tell exactly how accuracy is being judged.
The method is relevant but not fully secure, especially where the continuous-rod model is applied to an interlocking LEGO structure.
A second experimental pathway weakens the focus because it is not clearly tied back to the original aim.
Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Subject knowledge application
Moderate
B.2Use of terminology and concepts
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
The student uses a substantial amount of relevant mechanics vocabulary and equations, including bending moment, torque, centre of mass, and stress.
The student shows a solid understanding of the physical context by linking the LEGO model to the broader chimney problem.
The student generally uses terminology in a way that helps the reader follow the investigation, even when the application is not always perfect.
Some mechanical terms are used imprecisely, especially where shear, torsion, and bending are treated too interchangeably.
Parts of the theoretical model are not fully justified for the LEGO structure, particularly the assumption that a continuous rod analogy is appropriate.
Some formulas and variables are introduced in a way that is mathematically and physically unclear.
Criteria C: Critical Thinking
8/12
0
6
12
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Research analysis and evaluation
Poor
C.2Discussion and argument development
Poor
C.3Critical evaluation
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Presentation
3/4
0
2
4
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Structure and formatting
Excellent
D.2Layout and visual elements
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.